Anonymous ID: 901b90 Nov. 2, 2018, 12:02 a.m. No.3697001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

not sure if this was covered… from Qclockfag…

 

Today's Classic 180-Degree Q Clock Mirror :59

 

Pic 3

 

5:5

 

Forced reaction.

 

One of many vehicles.

 

Intercepts.

 

Night [2]

 

Fast movers.

 

Force projection.

 

https://www.livescience.com/63995-us-shoots-down-fake-nuclear-missile.html

 

The interceptor, called the Standard Missile-3 Block IIA, destroys targets with sheer force, rather than an explosive warhead, and according to its manufacturer Raytheon, the interceptor's "kill vehicle" (a projectile) rams into a ballistic missile with the force of a 10-ton truck traveling 600 mph (965 km/h).

 

But does any of this make the U.S. (or Japan) any safer? Are American cities less likely to be struck by nuclear missiles now? [The 22 Weirdest Military Weapons]

 

That's a much tougher question to answer.

 

This second-ever success for the SM-3 missile interceptor follows two public (and embarrassing) failures for the program, during which the interceptors failed to hit their targets. As Defense News reported, the first test in February 2017 was successful, but a second test in June 2017 failed after a sailor "accidentally triggered the missile’s self-destruct feature." A third test, in January, failed to hit the target.