>>3696761 LB
>There should be NOTHING, but yet…There's a LOT.
kek! Big Bang BTFO. Nobody has yet been able to explain to me how differentiation arose from an undifferentiated point in an undifferentiated environment.
Interesting explanation but I am thinking 'composition' rather than 'location'. In my experiment, by 'differentiation' I am referring to simultaneously existing different states of matter or energy. The initial infinitesimal point had no differentiation inside of it, per the theory and also as it had no "inside" anyway.
Then it explodes and expands into an undifferentiated environment (that is, having no forces or states of matter capable of acting on the expanding point in order to introduce competing vectors within the expansion).
With nothing to slow it, and nothing to stir it up, or poke it, there should be an homogeneous expanding energy field (a shell, actually, unless the explosion is continuous) — not all of this differentiated stuff.
But this are just ramblings from me, too. :)
>How does anon know for certain that there ever existed an infinitesimal point?
Pretty sure there was never such a thing, based on the reasoning outlined re differentiation. Actually I lean toward the Theory of No Beginning, which is not a very popular theory but eliminates a whole set of theoretical gymnastics about creation. The mind is heavily invested in expecting a beginning. I'm more interested in the interface between actual-now and whatever-comes-next.
>the center of the universe should ALWAYS be within the creator
Agreed!
I knew he reminded me of somebody!