Anonymous ID: 670cfb Nov. 2, 2018, 5:55 a.m. No.3698238   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8250 >>8263 >>8324 >>8632

Anons, I think I may have figured out a way to read the map. I think, at least partially. I'll show you two examples, and see if it makes any sense to you or if you find others. I've been doing it this way for a while and it seems to work, but haven't fine-tuned it.

 

Last Q post before the 23 days of radio silence referenced a post #175, which seems totally unrelated, right? Or, at least about some other stuff. But it says one important thing.

 

Learn to Read the Map

 

OK, so I look at the referenced post #175, by searching for "#175:" which has a time-stamp of :43: minutes.

 

Next, I look for 43 minute stamped posts by searching for ":43:"

Then we get, a bunch of posts, but which one looks most closely related to the initial post, the Q Press Release?

 

Well, Q Press Release was talking about how corrupt elements of the FBI needed to be removed. How? Stealth Bomber.

 

So this post looks pretty good. It's referencing a post with pics of the corrupt FBI and talking bombs.

 

>>1439665

 

Bomb disposal team.

 

Bomb(s) about to blow.

 

Which means?

 

1) They know

 

2) They are told (controlled)

 

3) Both

 

Coordinated.

 

Clowns wear masks.

 

Q

 

The timestamp was of :43: was for the referenced post, but the actual Q post is :49:, so search for :49:

 

And this one stood out, because what did Wray say at the presser about the Dem Bomber investigation? It was of "enormous scope," and something about being the most important thing or whatever.

 

Well. This post here… :49: Says

Scope & Size biggest in history.

 

Read it, it's epic.

 

>>1803997

 

Will she be indicted? And will this lead to BHO being indicted?

 

>>1804036

 

IG email investigation (weakest of set).

 

Opened door to:

 

Weiner HRC / Others - crimes against children.

 

Noose.

 

Ref to Huber?

 

Non public.

 

CF investigation ongoing.

 

Connected.

 

Ref to Huber?

 

+FBI protection of HRC.

 

+FBI criminal acts.

 

Ref to Huber?

 

What about DOJ texts/emails?

 

Why did the intel comm rate sections of the IG report @ highest level of NAT SEC?

 

What does it involve?

 

DOJ?

 

WH?

 

Tarmac?

 

Ref to Huber?

 

[[RR]]

 

IG report release does not coincide with true start date (info push to) of Huber re: above.

 

Scope & Size biggest in history.

 

Grand Jury in place?

 

Q

 

 

TLDR;

 

You basically just look for the referenced post's timestamp and chain it on from there, if there are several, you pick the one with the closest references to the prior, kind of like in a future proves past type thing.

 

just, by timestamps.

 

I'll do another example to see if I can answer whether or not 10 days of darkness starts in response to this one. Yes, I know we've already had it, but I'll chain it, maybe it will be useful.

Anonymous ID: 670cfb Nov. 2, 2018, 6:06 a.m. No.3698324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8505 >>8632

>>3698238

 

Second example is the last Q post with a referenced post (via screenshot) with a timestamp of :56:

 

Mathematically impossible or every detail planned?

 

Today.

 

1 Year Ago.

 

WWG1WGA!

 

Q

 

Search ":56" and the last post is

 

>>3224714

 

MIDTERM ELECTIONS>>>

 

[Days Prior]

 

11.11

 

What a wonderful day!

 

Q

 

What is 10 Days prior to 11.11? It is Nov 1

 

What's the timestamp of this referenced post? It's :56:

Search for ":56:"

 

I'll just leave you the link to take it from here, because there are plenty of posts with this timestamp…

 

https://qpress.org/?s=%3A56%3A

 

Or, you could just do the :01: of the actual Q post which circles you back to the beginning, because the 01 referenced :58:, which references :56:

 

multiple layers, choose your own adventure.

 

Sorry I didn't feature the post numbers on display when I built the site, but you can find the post numbers with a search "#XXX:" and search for minute timestamps with ":XX:"

Anonymous ID: 670cfb Nov. 2, 2018, 6:10 a.m. No.3698357   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3698263

 

sorry, I'm not so great at explaining what's in my head, but all you really have to do is look at a Q post, and if it referenced a prior post, then look at the minute time stamp on that referenced post. If there are several posts with that timestamp, pick one with similar key words or the main subject or theme of the last post you were on, and then just continue the process.

Anonymous ID: 670cfb Nov. 2, 2018, 6:32 a.m. No.3698505   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3698324

Correction, search ":56:"

you have to have the colon on the other side to pull up the minute timestamps, but it will return timestamps of both referenced posts and Q posts

Anonymous ID: 670cfb Nov. 2, 2018, 6:47 a.m. No.3698632   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3698238

 

>>3698324

So, I did a side by side on this one, you can find the link here

 

https://qpress.org/mathematically-impossible-or-every-detail-planned-today/

 

Theoretically, the setup I made for side-by-side proofs could be used to create the map for each referenced post and just keep chain linking referenced, related posts with the same time stamp to produce the map.

 

Both posts are talking about time ago, and got there just by following referenced post's timestamp.

 

Mathematically impossible or every detail planned?

Today.

1 Year Ago.

WWG1WGA!

Q

 

MIDTERM ELECTIONS>>>

[Days Prior]

11.11

What a wonderful day!

Q