Anonymous ID: 49c7d1 Nov. 2, 2018, 8:55 a.m. No.3699811   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9916

>>3699781

Oops, not an "NPC meme"; moreover, your response reflects a failure to READ the text included in the image. How do you account for this failure on your part, friendly, honest, sincere helpful human that just dropped by to share your profound refutations of Q based on "the science of NLP" (lol)? We eagerly await the erection of your credibility.

Welcome aboard.

Anonymous ID: 49c7d1 Nov. 2, 2018, 9:06 a.m. No.3699916   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3699811

Oops, another propaganda failure by the incompetent AI system.

Note: it wasn't a human "shill". A human shill would have read the meme.

So think about the sophistication of the "top bots" that we see. Then think of the pervasiveness of bots hereโ€ฆ then you begin to understand realityโ€ฆ