BOOM
Come now anon, why would you make an uncharitable comment without making any effort to learn about what you are attacking? Do you want us divided?
Wittgenstein is portrayed symbolically, as part of a complex symbol involving a number of elements.
i.e., a patsy
It's absolutely ridiculous. It's like saying that if you're worried about Genghis Khan, you're "racist against Asians".
Explain anon.
You don't talk like a patriot. Are you UNABLE to explain what you meant? I think it's pretty obvious you are.
We know what is fake and what is not. If you can't speak intelligently and like a human, no one is going to find you credible. And indeed, you will only discredit whatever it is you try to promote. Think about it.
Knows what? What do we know here? What contradicts what, and how are contradictions resolved?
We don't just like little bots a little bits of information, right anon? We are thinking patriots here. So let's stop playing games and be explicit, because there are obvious implied contradictions. You have to at least MAKE AN ARGUMENT establishing a narrative that contradicts the prevailing one here. This isn't FAKE /POL/, right? Even though many "anons" simulate fake /pol/ here, it isn't that. Because Q and POTUS explicitly refute that. So tell us how YOU resolve the apparent implied contradictions to your satisfaction as the patriot we know you are.