Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 11:48 a.m. No.3701817   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1884 >>1903

>>3701406 <<Anonymous 11/02/18 (Fri) 14:23:17 6e3b47 No.3701406

File (hide): 8eb68e64ecdc676⋯.jpg (4.43 MB, 4000x3113, 4000:3113, q-hatch-act-safe.jpg)

>>>/patriotsfight/379 <<Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 11/02/18 (Fri) 14:35:57 No.379

File (hide): 8284738cd31083c⋯.jpg (518.8 KB, 2048x1594, 1024:797, DrBH7aTXcAEMZH7.jpg-large.jpg)

resized

Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 11:54 a.m. No.3701920   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3701884

not lawfag level at all, but the hatch act text quoted here seems very ambiguous to me… seems some actions are permitted and others disallowed, but the definitions leave much room for interpretation…

if not outright contradicting…

 

>>3701486 <<pr.

>i guess some will obviously argue that crumbs/memes posted are displaying & distributing "campaign materials"…

>the rules seem a bit contradictory, though:

>"May not post a comment to a blog or a social media site"

>"May not use any e-mail account or social media"

>but

>"May express opinions about candidates and issues"… IRL only?

Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 12:05 p.m. No.3702091   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3701903

>>DrBH7aTXcAEMZH7.jpg-large.jpg

>is the file name generated by Twitter.

aaaah, very thanks, illuminating.

>Q team waits from something to be posted to Twitter

seems so… twas a good one, didn't have to wait long

Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 12:11 p.m. No.3702189   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2315

>>3702168

> Employee may express opinions about political candidates and issues…

yes, but

>"May not post a comment to a blog or a social media site"

>"May not use any e-mail account or social media"

…?

Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 12:15 p.m. No.3702249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2293

>>3702182

sweet, never was a fan at all but i'm glad to see your work has graphically evolved a lot… getting into interesting territory, good job leveling up and all the best for what's yet to come

Anonymous ID: ef764b Nov. 2, 2018, 12:21 p.m. No.3702355   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3702315

I would agree, and overall am not worried about Q & Hatch Act at all, but have to admit the wording often leaves much room for interpretation/debate.

But good, that's a debate we'd love to see get evermore public, so…