>>3704724 (lb)
Stay focused! Whether it's true or not, does what needs to be done here really change?
Or watch this one go fishing for an opinion that the interviewee does not actually hold. Major fail on her part!
Sorry, no, but you're wrong. A few years ago, I'd seen articles that there was chemtrailing planned for a certain date, at a certain place. As luck would have it, I ended up being in that place at that time. Pure luck. In the middle of the day, I needed to go outside to get something. As I walked across the street, I looked up. In the sky, cloud tracks crossed the sky, complete with loop backs at the end of each track, alternating ends. I tried to photograph it, but the sunlight behind the cloud tracks was too strong. I was only able to photograph a corner of the tracking. Some may say that this was just tracking from planes traveling in and out of the nearby airport. The problem with that theory would be that the predominant direction of the tracking was perpendicular to the traffic patterns in and out of the airport. Plus, the tracks would not loop back on alternating ends, either.
Dude, my story is SAUCE. It happened. The appearance of that sky could not have been anything other than chemtrailing.
Did you happen to notice if they looped back at alternate ends?
Planes DO emit contrails. No question. But what we're talking about with regard to chemtrails is different. Just because your plane isn't used for chemtrailing doesn't mean there aren't planes that are. And it's so obviously deliberate at times. Kinda wish I'd tried harder to get the photographs. I had to stand in the shadow of a building to get these. But maybe old satellite photos will show what happened that day.
Oh, and someone once posted a photo of Pres. Trump visiting a plane that had canisters in it. I think it was on 4chan. Anyone want to go digging?
Who says it was combusted?
You're assuming that the trails are coming out of the engines. That may not necessarily be true.