>>3704918

Antarctica is not "going to melt." The ice cover on Antarctica is growing:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

The RATE of ice loss in Antarctica is increasing, but the dishonest mainstream media and "peer reviewed journals" attribute this to global warming.

In fact, we are 13,000 out of 26,000 years into a precessional axis tilt-related period, in which the north pole will get progressively longer summers, and the south pole will get progressively longer winters.

The "ice age" that ended 13,000 years ago was a northern hemisphere ice age.

>>3705367

> but the dishonest mainstream media and "peer reviewed journals" attribute this to global warming

In fact, the increase in the rate of ice loss in Antarctica is caused by the rising sea level which, in turn, is caused by the melting of the north pole.

Dishonest media and "peer reviewed journals" tiptoe around this, assuming the inverse causal relationship, namely, that a melting south pole is causing the rising ocean.

Causality only flows one way. It is NOT scientific to assume which way it flows.

>>3705459

But the icecapS are not melting. Only one of them is melting.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

>>3705502

No. I indicated that the RATE of ice loss in antarctica is increasing.

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/ramp-up-in-antarctic-ice-loss-speeds-sea-level-rise

However this is distinct from a net loss of ice. Antarctica is gaining ice mass.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

The increase in RATE of loss is caused by the rising sea which, in turn, is caused by the melting north pole.

Evidence conjecture and made up facts like "the south pole is melting."