Anonymous ID: f48a57 Nov. 2, 2018, 4:13 p.m. No.3705795   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5817

>>3705739

Encrypted military transmissions are not notable in any way, other than if there's an unusual quantity of them. These transmissions occur every single day and there is no way on earth that anybody but the intended recipients will be able to decode them.

If you post it again after this warning, anons will assume you are shilling the bread.

Here is the log for anyone who is interested

http://www.eam.watch/skykings

"

 

Emergency Action Messages (EAM's) are encrypted messages sent through the High Frequency Global Communications System (HFGCS).

 

While the messages can not be decrypted by the average person, the frequency of broadcasts, and types of broadcasts are interesting.

 

Due to the fact EAM's and SKY KING messages can be used to direct nuclear forces it has become a hobby for some to try and detect the on-set of WW3 by looking for abnormally large amount of traffic being broadcasted.

 

The goal of this site is to help detect patterns in broadcasts that can be associated with real world events, and operating procedures.

 

All Times are listed in ZULU (GMT) time as the transmissions can be received across the globe.

"

Anonymous ID: f48a57 Nov. 2, 2018, 4:26 p.m. No.3705958   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6038

>>3705911

That is caused by the video compression algorithm or the video transmission feed being unable to keep up. MP4 video calculates rectangles, which get smaller and more accurate when the algorithm can keep up. Probably they are feeding over wireless and there are simply too many cellular users in that vicinity and data packets are being dropped in great quantities. MP4 decodes a data stream with dropped packets by filling in entire rectangles with a color chosen from a compression table, until a new key frame arrives. If the periodic key frames are missed, things get messed up.

Anonymous ID: f48a57 Nov. 2, 2018, 4:37 p.m. No.3706137   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6219

>>3706038

I don't know. I sort of doubt it but am willing to be proven wrong. The specifications for MPEG are published and a person could study them and form their own conclusions… Just like messages can be encoded in still images using steganography, I presume messages could be encoded in a moving image stream, but never looked into the matter. Logic suggests that a video encoded inside a video would be of lower bandwidth than the video that encapsulates it. That might mean fewer frames per second, smaller resolution, etc.

But then I am just speculating.

Anonymous ID: f48a57 Nov. 2, 2018, 4:54 p.m. No.3706393   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3706229 Zero is losing his shit….can't keep his lies straight. Loser is terrified and can't hide it…..seems he is resorting to Mother's Little Helper more & more often…like 24/7.

 

Having 2 pizza loving rump rangers in the WH was such a defilement.