>>3466717 (ob)

Building off the Hatch Act research put together by Anon here, I made a little graphic using logical premises that conclude that Military Intelligence does not fall under the Hatch Act.

Q could have legally started under MI without violating the Hatch Act.

As the quoted Anon proved, ARRESTS cannot happen because of the Hatch Act, but the government can legally mobilize MI without violating Hatch.

>>3706766

I was feeling the energy while building that proof, so I kept the premises going.

Here's another logical proof that concludes that POTUS can legally deploy 1 million troops from the Ready Reserve in these times of formal National Security without violating Posse Comitatus.