Judy Munro-Leighton: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

1. Grassley Is Asking the FBI & Department of Justice to Investigate Munro-Leighton

2. Grassley Calls Judy Munro-Leighton a ‘Left-Wing Activist’

3. Munro-Leighton Is Accused of Telling Committee Investigators She ‘Just Wanted to Get Attention’

4. Munro-Leighton Was a Protester Against the Iraq War, Reports Say

5. Judy Munro-Leighton Has Given Money to Democratic Candidates

https://heavy.com/news/2018/11/judy-munro-leighton-5-fast-facts-you-need-to-know/

The Nazi Roots of Climate Change

We owe Ms. Ocasio-Cortez a high degree of thanks for this important warning, but one awakening has to occur before we can take full advantage of its true value. When it comes to "climate change" as well as other "environmentalist" issues, it is Ocasio-Cortez and her party who have more in common with Hitler's Third Reich than the Republicans and conservatives who oppose them and whom they smear as "Nazis" with remarks like hers.

Please note that I'm not saying liberal environmentalists are Nazis, nor that they are anti-Semitic or want to start a world war. However, since Ocasio-Cortez (and other Democrats) brought the Nazis into this discussion, there are striking similarities between these two political movements – sufficient similarities that the Bronx Democrat's warning should have our alarm lights flashing, big time! The fact that modern Democrats share with the Nazis the claim that the only way to heal what ails this planet and perhaps even prevent the demise of all of humanity is to put them in power certainly has my alarms flashing.

In "The Nazi Roots of the Global Warming Scare" by Kerry Jackson in Investor's Business Daily, Rupert Darwall, author of Green Tyranny, is quoted as having stated, in an interview with Encounter Books, "If you look at what the Nazis were doing in the 1930s, in their environmental policies, virtually every theme you see in the modern environmental movement, the Nazis were doing[.]"

Among those themes common to the modern environmental movement and the 1930s Nazis was "climate change." In "The Nazi Origins of Renewable Energy (and Global Warming)," David Archibald wrote that the first German-language article (perhaps the first political article) on "human-caused climate change" was created in 1941 by Hermann Flohn, a scientist for the German Meteorological Service who became the chief meteorologist for the Luftwaffe High Command. The title of that article translates as "The Activity of Man as a Climate Factor."

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/11/the_nazi_roots_of_climate_change.html

(cont)

>>3714151

(cont)

That is just the tip of this "common theme" iceberg. In order to pursue their stated goal of "preventing harm to the environment," Hitler's Third Reich passed the Reichsnaturschutzgesetz (Reich Nature Protection Law) in 1933. According to Duncan Bayne in "How to Spot a Nazi," the purpose of this act was to increase control over the German populace by requiring that decisions on how a person could use his property be first approved by the Reich. Sound familiar?

Further confirming the Reich's identification as a "Green" party and its similarity to America's liberal Democrats: the Nazis were among the first, if not the first, to enact laws to protect wilderness and endangered species. Granted, the species and the forests protected were examples iconic of Germany. Nevertheless, the "common theme" connection remains. In addition, the Nazis passed the first animal rights laws and the first anti-vivisection law, and they were the first to protect wolves in 1930s Germany. Liberals, mostly Democrats, have passed similar measures in the modern U.S.

Where does this lead, and why should we take warning? An author known for his insights, H.L. Mencken, wrote in his book Prejudices: First Series, "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule."

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/11/the_nazi_roots_of_climate_change.html

(cont)

>>3714168

(cont)

Providing support for that insight, the campaigns of the Nazis of the 1930s and the liberal Democrats of today are both based on the contention that not putting their political party in charge of humankind's relationship to planet Earth, to all its plants and animals, and to one another will cause everything (including the ecosystem, habitat, weather/climate…) to deteriorate, get worse, perhaps even cause the demise of humankind.

In other words, the real common theme between these two movements, and plenty of others like them, is, if all problems can be traced to your opponents, the only solution to everything is…you.

What's an alternative to this "put us in charge or we're all going to die" madness? The U.S. solution: Give people the freedom to recognize problems, environmental as well as otherwise, and address those problems with practical rather than political solutions. That pits us against our problems rather than against each other.

Synergies made possible by free enterprise and free elections in the U.S. have solved more problems, environmental, economic, and political, and have sustained more freedoms in the process, than any "put us in charge or else" regimes anywhere on the planet.

As a matter of fact, if (or when) the climate ever does begin to change in a manner that requires action on our part, whether that change is caused by nature or by us, it is a much better bet that an effective means to deal with that change will come to us via pragmatism rather than dogmatism.

…if we have the freedom to apply it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/11/the_nazi_roots_of_climate_change.html

>>3714179

Kinda hard to find this Nazi information in current history books.

Wonder why?

>>3714231

Yes Dems, turn your clocks back to 1930s:

>>3714151 ←——–

>The fact that modern Democrats share with the Nazis the claim that the only way to heal what ails this planet and perhaps even prevent the demise of all of humanity is to put them in power certainly has my alarms flashing.

Election Day: An hour-by-hour viewer’s guide

6 p.m. Eastern—The Canary in Coal Country

Barr represents a district that voted for President Trump by a 15-point margin in 2016 — but it’s a district with Democratic roots, one long held by former Rep. Ben Chandler (D). If McGrath pulls off an early upset, Republicans are going to have a very bad night. But if Barr hangs on, as polling indicates, the GOP’s House majority is still in play.

7 p.m.—The First Hints

Six states close their polling places at 7 p.m., from liberal Vermont to conservative South Carolina, and the rest of Kentucky.

7:30 p.m.—A Blue Moon and a Blue Dog

Polls close in North Carolina, Ohio and West Virginia at this time. Two red state Senate Democrats will see their fates decided: Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) is likely to cruise to reelection, and Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.) is favored to win, but in a much tighter race.

8 p.m.—The Big Enchilada

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia are done voting by 8 o’clock Eastern, including a handful of states that will give a fuller picture of the electorate’s mood.

8:30 p.m.—The (French) Hill to Die On

Arkansas voters are likely to reelect Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R). The only truly competitive race here is in the state’s 2nd district, where Rep. French Hill (R) faces a tough challenge from state Rep. Clarke Tucker (D).

9 p.m.—Go West, Young Man

The first Mountain West states start to close at this time, along with most of the Midwest.

10 p.m.—Defining the Wave

If a Democratic blue wave is forming, we’ll get a sense of how high it is when polls close in Iowa, Montana, Nevada and Utah.

11 p.m.—The Best Coast

Polls close in four of the five states that touch the Pacific Ocean, along with Idaho.

1 a.m.—The Aleutian Solution

The vast majority of polling places in Alaska close at midnight Eastern time, but seven hours after the first polls close in Kentucky, voters in parts of the Aleutian Islands will cast the final ballots of the 2018 general election.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/414637-election-day-an-hour-by-hour-viewers-guide

>>3714466

Good find!

POTUS tweeted about her this am - this would be a good POTUS retweet!

>>3714488

>>3714466

Isn't this one way they launder money?

Democrat running against Steve King raised over $900K in past week

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/414704-steve-king-opponent-raised-over-900000-in-week-after-avalanche-of-king

Montana Libertarian Party rejects candidate’s endorsement of GOP nominee Rosendale in Senate race

“The Montana Libertarian Party continues to fully support and endorse Libertarian Rick Breckenridge for Senate. We believe he is still Montana's best choice of the current candidates because he is a champion of freedom and limiting government while embracing cooperation and rational decision-making," the party wrote in a statement.

"He is neither a Trump acolyte like his Republican opponent, nor a promoter of fear and divisiveness to manipulate voters like his Democrat opponent,” the statement continued. "Many [party members] feel betrayed by Breckenridge’s statement because Libertarians do not automatically vote for a Republican or Democrat in the absence of a Libertarian candidate."

The party went on to state that the endorsement would have little to no impact on the race, as many Libertarian or independent voters would either not vote in Tuesday's election or would opt to leave the Senate race blank on their ballots.

"The MTLP understands, Breckenridge's disgust and disappointment with the underhanded campaign tactics that preyed on his good name to denigrate Commissioner Rosendale," they added. "However, the MTLP cannot in good conscience agree with Breckenridge’s views about this election."

Breckenridge said in a conference call with reporters Wednesday that he does not have the votes to win and made the endorsement to push back on “dark money” in politics.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/414696-montana-libertarian-party-rejects-candidates-endorsement-of-gop-nominee

>>3714571

>>3714440

Here you are!

Just go with the flow.