>anon arbitrarily ignores the important fact that [15] [10] [5] etc. have always referenced Q/POTUS deltas, not POTUS/POTUS.
>anon arbitrarily assigns meanings to minute delta values between trump tweets
>anon arbitrarily picks which trump tweet pairs to apply analysis to
>anon arbitrarily invents interpretations based on the content of these tweets, entirely from their imagination
Wew, what a MUST READ!
It's completely amazing to me just how many anons continue to mistake reading tea leaves for analysis.