>Anons on edge a liddle.
They're not anons
They jump on after Q posts
then try to nannyfag us into faceberg 2.0
like entitled SJW's
I didn't get the sense he was calling you out as lewd, he defended your 20 yr.old poast. He was just saying that lewd-posting in general was annoying. He's said before that he & BV's have tracked the most lewd nudies
as coming from known shills. TY bewbs and baker girls for baker at start of the bread are one thing–I was pro-bewbs at bewb-gate–but when a type of post gets taken over by shills and intentionally twisted, it will have a negative effect on the board, that's the point. We still don't censor legal stuff, and shouldn't, it's just something to be aware of. (((They))) try to fucking ruin everything good.