Anonymous ID: ef80ce Nov. 4, 2018, 10:01 a.m. No.3728228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8247 >>8337

>>3728027

Yes, absurd. Signifier as in

  • affirmative - negative

After stating something as unique as (((WWG1WGA))) with triple parenthesis (rarely used) it should have been a huge confirmation. While obviously all things must have some element of plausible deniability. It’s supposed to be a message for us. This one has annoyed me plenty with the shilling efforts to twist it into all manner of things and avoid the very obvious proof.

Anonymous ID: ef80ce Nov. 4, 2018, 10:09 a.m. No.3728337   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3728228

Adding the (((Q+))) shouldn’t have been needed to confirm this one. It’s sad to me to see anyone take the bait. Anyone doubting Q at this stage needs to go find something else to do while we patriots continue to take our country back. WWG1WGA!!