>>3732912

>Stone - The Force/Stength capable of yielding power to act on info

And yet, some here still push that this first line in the dough

>We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

Shouldn't be corrected to the use of violence instead..

>>3732984

You posted the cap showing that POTUS and Patriots = STONE = The force / strength capable of yielding power to act on info…

but then argue that you don't condone being a POSITIVE FORCE for change?

PENCE on the stage.