>>3738750

>The simpler the explanation the better.

The simpler explanation is that Q used 32 regular dashes.

https://twitter.com/Kath3853/status/1059193352585908230https://twitter.com/Tko77457444/status/1059198355799240704https://twitter.com/WwgQn/status/1059198596560683008Eyes On, Patriots!--------------------------------EndTOGETHER we are STRONG.TOGETHER WE WIN!Q

https://twitter.com/Kath3853/status/1059193352585908230

https://twitter.com/Tko77457444/status/1059198355799240704

https://twitter.com/WwgQn/status/1059198596560683008

Eyes On, Patriots!

——————————–End

TOGETHER we are STRONG.

TOGETHER WE WIN!

Q

>>3739009

> "Mechanically, yes"

Mechanical, as opposed to?…

You write "Q has type a string of em dashes, a single en dash". No, this is just how it appears here.

The board processes character sequences typed in, turning 3 hyphens -'-'- into an em-dash — and 2 hyphens -- into an en-dash –.

I am just saying the simplest way to obtain 10 em-dash and 1 en-dash here is, demonstrably, to input 32 regular hypens.

1 -

2 –

3 —

4 —-

5 —–