Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:23 a.m. No.3739827   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

It's funny that we have this DEEP DREAM AI technology being used on LOTS of images around hereโ€ฆ and it has a tendency to more or less fuck-up the faces of people deep dreamed, and yet I have NEVER seen these done to the enemies of our movement, but ONLY to those on our sideโ€ฆ Weird

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:31 a.m. No.3739892   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9919 >>9923 >>9931

>>3739853

How does it do that? By dehumanizing them, which only makes them emotional, defensive, and thus CLOSES their minds? By making US seem like a scary, agressive, hateful and DEHUMANIZING movement? Explain, using common sense, how that HELPS us to wake people to a truth that is POSITIVE, and not miserable and hateful. Thanks anon!

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:35 a.m. No.3739922   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9937 >>0125

>>3739897

I asked you to explain in more depth, and outlined the particular psychological and social reference point I had in mind. And you are responding with a mindless, generic response, that includes the infantile attempt to "call me an NPC". Which is just plain goofy, anon. We are all patriots here, trying to find the truth.

If you HONESTLY think that meme is helping us WITH WHAT Q HAS TOLD US, then please address what I asked you. Thanks anon.

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:38 a.m. No.3739938   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3739919

We are all patriots here. I certainly am. Calling an anon "a commie" for asking questions about a meme is hardly the spirit of the Q movement.

Nor is it clear why anons here would be so defensive about this meme.

  1. Is the meme dehumanizing?

  2. Is dehumanizing going to WAKE people to the truth, or close them off to it?

  3. Do WE need to be tearing people down? Why? Cite a single instance of Q encouraging us to tear people down.

  4. How does us "tearing people down" fit with "THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED"

 

Thanks anon.

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:41 a.m. No.3739948   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9969 >>0061

>>3739937

It is extremely silly for anons to all adopt the identical rhetorical pose, which happens to be the exact same pose that we see struck over and over and over in defense of the "viral NPC meme". You would have to admit that when anon after anon after anon posts the same thoughts, the same (not very interesting) memes, and exhibits identical attitudesโ€ฆ well, that starts to seem rather inorganic. Have you considered that? Just food for thought. We are here to work with Q. If the "NPC meme" is helping with that, the I don't see why it would be so hard to explain it. Defensive and repetitive responses are not what patriots are about. Thanks.

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:45 a.m. No.3739972   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9980 >>9981 >>9994 >>0081

>>3739935

I can't think of a reason that the baker can't even answer a simple question when asked. I can't think of a reason the image that is used to make the "yellow memes" that we see over and over and over here, which are made with the DEEP DREAM AI generator, would be a secret.

What do you think anon? We are all patriots here. This isn't /pol/, or anything like that. We are working together for a common cause. If there is a particular brand or style of meme that has effectively become a form of "branding" here (because so very many are posted), it stands to reason the seed image to create that style should be shared, so all anons can use it. Do you disagree?

Thanks.

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:46 a.m. No.3739978   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3739969

I'm not crying.

And my reason for pushing the question is that I think it is being pushed by those that wish to derail our POSITIVE movement and keep us wallowing in pointless, destructive negativity. If our movement weren't going on, I would probably just shrug and ignore it. But we are at war. Did you not notice that anon?

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:48 a.m. No.3740000   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0010 >>0015 >>0043

>>3739969

And I am skeptical that most humans laugh much at it. It just isn't that funny. It's exceedingly 'meh'. The only sort of glee it might induce is in those that are eager to cause stress in the people targetted by the meme. A sort of hateful glee. But that, again, is not what we're about. Our mission is to wake people to DIFFICULT truth. If they don't trust us, and see US as their enemy, then how can we do our job? Think about it.

Thanks

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: f2a60c Nov. 5, 2018, 6:54 a.m. No.3740037   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3739981

>>3739980

Very interesting that

  1. The baker is incapable of speaking for himself

  2. Anons are very defensive about keep the "yellow meme" seed image SECRET

  3. Anons are chiming in almost simultaneously and expressing IDENTICAL attitudes.

 

This has nothing to do with "owing" things. We are a team. WWG1WGA. Why would anons be hostile about sharing images, of all things? That doesn't make a shred of sense anon. Think about it. Thanks

WWG1WGA