>>374178
>Keep disecting the portait.
Why? Did Q ask us to do that?
>>374189
So Q didn't ask us to dissect the Obama portraits, which have been done, and someone points that out to you and your response is "leave"?
>yes, goyim, keep doing something that is irrelevant, don't bother with Q's actual questions
hmmm...
>The security clearance process is
which brings up
House Oversight Committee Launches Probe Into Porter
>, The Hill reports that Gowdy separately sent a letter on Wednesday to FBI Director Christopher Wray seeking clarity on how the bureau investigates and issues interim security clearances. Gowdy also asked when the FBI notified the White House of any underlying issues with Porter's background check, which has become a source of controversy.
With Priestap's wife and the process of sec clearances for the WH under scrutiny, this is going to backfire on them just as badly as the entire "Russian collusion" ploy.
https:// www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-14/house-oversight-committee-launches-probe-porter
For a little while, you can give the benefit of the doubt when anons go off the rails and chasing red herrings. But there is a point where you have to look at those who are 1) asking anons to do shit Q never mentioned and 2) freaking out on anyone who points that out as suspect.
Yes, I'm being overly charitable again.
What did Gorka RT from thernovich that was so disturbing? I didn't see it (not on twatter)…
There's an actual office that processes the security clearance info/applications for the WH in particular, it's tied to Priestap's wife. I can't remember the name of the office, it was in the threads last night.
Right. Well we've already figured that out, the comment was about dissecting the minutiae of the Obama portrait, which has gone on since it was released.
>is not excatly in the above. In fact, the answer is already practically given by Q above.
That's my point.
>>374268
I asked a person a specific question, they can answer or not. I do the spreadsheet and make memes, you are welcome to fuck right off.
You're welcome, I wish more did :/
>>374457
Accepted, no worries. There are unfriendly intel here trying to shepherd anons AWAY from Q. Anons get touchy (self included). I do understand re: sigils.
Yes. The office in charge of WH security clearances SAT ON the info (laying a land mine to be exploited later). Posted about the bureaucracy last nite & what the Obama holdovers are doing (laying land mines, in a coordinated fashion, specifically treasonous behavior).
Now HOC doing an investigation into Porter is essentially the same as Muller investigation into "Russia collusion" - what will be exposed is the intentional malfeasance done by Obama holdovers, not wrong-doing by Kelly or POTUS.
THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID!!
>>374474
>the plan was for this painting to hang in the whitehouse.
Actually those are for a museum, the ones that will hang in the WH will be "more traditional" - statement by the Smithsonian (IIRC) yesterday.
>why do we have anons who are continually whining about doing it the "other" way?
You mean THE DIRECTIONS THAT Q GAVE?
That way?
The actual question is:
why are there faggots trying to keep pushing THE OPPOSITE of what Q instructed?
Anon A
>Yeah, we should follow Q's directions
Anon B
>oh hell naw, we gonna do it a totally different way, if you don't agree (and want to follow Q's directions) you whinin'
What the actual fuck.
Why would Q set up a system of comms and give us directions if he wanted you to make up your own system?
What the actual fuck? It's not difficult to understand.
Checked and I fucking love our POTUS, just continually amazed at the enormous amount accomplished in such a short time. Roadblocks removed. Very good analogy.
Ok sorry, and thanks for the clarification. Shit is maddening. Really glad you are here and SEE.
>Sun Myung Moon
Does he still own the Washington Times?
Ever see the entire list of all the ministers he gives huge $$$ to? (eye opener)
>Clown Post?
Yes.
Agree with the anon who said it may have been a device check. Would also add that someone in a previous thread connected that to the incident at the NSA today… not saying definitively that was it, but it certainly made a sort of sense, especially the military sense of humor.