>>374229

>1) asking anons to do shit Q never mentioned and 2) freaking out on anyone who points that out as suspect.

When it's as simple as re_reading crumbs to see EXACTLY what Q has suggested or requested, there should be no argument.

<I wonder why BHO is depicted sitting in a bush

>Find the link.

>Look around.

>What does it signify?

>What are they sitting on?

>Perfectly lined up?

>Why?

>Learn.

>Flowers & Gardens.

>Learn the hidden symbolism.http:// www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/slave-gardens

>What does a 'Flower' represent?

>What does 'Deflower' represent?

>Think children.

>Think slaves.

>Think sheep.

<controlling the crops, controls the people (sheep)

(might be reaching, but throwing it out there)

>Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?

>Sound familiar?

>Wonder where they derived that idea from.

<Keep disecting the portait.

is not excatly in the above. In fact, the answer is already practically given by Q above.

<controlling the crops, controls the people (sheep)

(might be reaching, but throwing it out there)

>Coincidence the Matrix (movie) grew people as a crop, used for energy, and controlled their mind?

>>374276

I say stick with Q and POTUS re: deltas.

If "helper" posts are REALLY there, then they'll stand out OWN THEIR OWN, and get conversation going. If not, well, Q posts and POTUS tweets are already delta verified. This shouldn't be a divider, it's simply a matter of sticking to the original plan until it's confirmed that otherwise is required.

>>374287

Thanks, but, the name?

>>374310

No, I meant this name:

>NWO death Anonymous 

let your dig stand out on it's own

>>374333

Ever heard of GMOs? this is nothing new. Re_read the crumb, don't read into it

>>374347

Precisely BV!

Yesterday's discovery (DeltaAnon) is sufficient to guide us in the right direction, the "look, POTUS is posting as random anon!" slide was probably to keep THAT discovery by DeltaAnon from happening, imo. Too late now.

Marching on, staying frosty

>>374360

See it guys?

>>374383

>>374398

>>374400

>>374401

>>374421

Flowers = Children (slave gardens)

These 2 pictures are saying EXACTLY the same thing, per Q here >>351282

Put it together Autists

>>374428

PRECISELY!!!

>>374440

^^^^^^^

Thanks for paying attention!

>>374475

>Who really controls NK?

Pedos, question is, which ones?

>>374468

Yes, Children, Slaves, and Sheep, with O being in control of them all

>Who really controls NK?

>These people are sick!

>>374612

Retarded question, no.

Question to provoke thought, Yes.

EVERYONE who is a participant, aside from those obvious in the pics we've seen here thus far, aren't the only ones. Who ELSE in involved, is what my question implies. We have more than we know, yet, we don't know it ALL. Asking questions (whether seen as retarded or not), leads to answers.

>>374712

This one was beat to death already. Nothing substantial was found with those stars.

>>374712

see >>374257

re: the clock and the graphic

>>374685

Taking a picture with someone =/= an alliance.Can you PROVE an alliance, or is this just conjecture?

>>374763

Sounds like a good idea. I noticed that African-AMERICANS was used, as opposed to Black. Much more inclusive, words matter

>>374795

Please point to your original thread. I read the article of the photographer (Askia Muhammad), who was told to withhold the photo to keep it from harming O's run for president.

"photograph of then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama (D) and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan that he took in 2005 at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting, but did not make public because he believed it would have “made a difference” to Obama’s political future."

sauce: https:// talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/photo-of-obama-louis-farrakhan-to-be-released

I took a picture with a liberal mayor, just to say that I was there that doesn't automatically mean that we were in cahoots, is all I'm saying.

>>374838

Q would be best qualified to answer that question. We can't assume that Q had more to post, we don't know what else needed to be done aside form posting. We may "want" to be Q's 1st priority, like he wakes up just to lurk and post with us (like some of us do), however it's more likely we are only a part of Q's entire mission. A security test is just that.