Aww shit… You know it's going mainstream when you see a kid with a trumpunisher shirt on, kek
Aww shit… You know it's going mainstream when you see a kid with a trumpunisher shirt on, kek
Think of this:
WHY are the "journos" bloviating about this object?
We already know [they] try to:
Poison the well by trying to insert bs early. (ie- the "first reporter" ruse)
Insert narrative with no facts.
Distort whatever facts there are.
Something is spoopy about that object. WE know:
It's probably red.
It's long (uncommon for an asteroid or even a planetesimal)
it's tumbling end over end.
It sped up during it's slingshot around the sun in ways that cannot be explained by just the gravity of the sun acting on the object. (ie- it accelerated with no apparent accelerative factors.)
That is all that we know about it. Everything else is speculation.
I've looked at all of the times Q mentions "star"
Q was being sarcastic at the anon they responded to.
>How far away is the closest star?
>What do you think?
Q has called anons gold star researchers.
Q has told anons to think for themselves.
>How far away is the closest star?
Let me rephrase that:
How far away is the closest autist?
What do you think?
;)
Ah yes, I forgot about the four Stars posts. In context, though, Q is talking about people in those four posts.
As a matter of fact, if viewed in the context of sarcasm, even the first star post refers to people.
If so, that would mean all six "star" posts… reference people.
Not heavenly bodies ;)
Are you a star? I try to be ;p
Antarctica is exactly the same way:
Something IS going on down there. Otherwise statesmen and religious heads would not bother to go there.
Admiral Byrd would have had an uneventful sail ;p
What is going on down there has been buried in so much disinformation and secrecy, that it's kind of pointless mentally masturbating about it without further evidence.