>>3747094 (pb)

>Fake News.

>But, both brothers do have a pending sealed indictment.

>Q

Wow…Q telling us the names of defendants in sealed indictments?!!

Sealed indictments are supposed to be secret right and on a secret/sealed special docket?

Lawfags/Q what does this mean that Q told us this?

Podesta bros have been served a partially unselaed indictment?

In the process of serving Podestas?

Unsealing imminent?

>>3747664

Beautiful!

>>3747674

>could be unsealed already but not made public is my best guess

Thanks for the insight lawfag!

>>3747673

>'When lawyers don't have the facts on their side, they attack individuals'. -Chuck Grassley on Avenatti

I caught that too because I have been a victim of this corrupt lawyer tactic!