>>3766505 (last)
Not lost, there's no real "there" there for the Dems to find. But it'll be a boring 2 years with the Senate doing nothing but confirming great judges and justices!
That's if the Dems take the House majority.
Someone ought to look into the voting in NY.
Last year it was astonishing, every single Dem won in that odd-year election. We had one person running for a town Tax Receiver whose husband was known to be in legal trouble for embezzling money and they needed lots of cash to keep his little hedge fund afloat – when that news came out they could not take her name off the ballot bc ballots were already printed. But she got over 30% of the vote! Every other Dem won, it didn't matter who the Dem was, who the Rep was, how did the state that elected George Pataki governor (Republican) turn so deep blue? I don't really believe it, some fuckery is going on here.
>>3770297 and can't he formally say no? What right would they have to demand them?
The racial stuff has a lot of truth in it, I thought there was some drift in the black vote, Blexit, etc. But anyway there are differences in racial averages in voting. It has nothing to do with "kikes", it just is.