>>3779134

>>3779226

In the 1982 Midterms, the GOP lost 26 House seats and 1 Senate seat. The GOP had 54 Senate seats after the midterms and about 30-40 fewer house seats after the midterms than the GOP will have now. And in 1984, Reagan won 49 states.

Don't try to project what's going to happen from what just happened.

There could've been a FISA declas. There was not. The benefits of a FISA declas could've been seen before the election. They were not.

So, maybe we're being jerked around by some random person on the internet or by some high placed white house insider, or by some social media intern at the white house, telling the conspiracy watchers something sweet that they know we'll like. And maybe Trump actually does all this stuff that Q is telling us he'll do.

Now, if Trump does all this stuff that he's supposed to, according to Q, well, I would think that the Democrats would be absolutely crushed by all of this, and Trump would do incredibly well in 2020.

>>3779292

No dude, it's not a stupid idea at all. (((They))) pick both sides most of the time. See Protocols.

The problem with his idea is that it doesn't really look like Trump has that kind of reach. If he had a person he wanted, some Amarosa or other, you'd think he'd use them as GOP.

But some suggest that Avenatti is a Trump plant, someone Trump can argue with in a skit way.

It's not a bad idea at all to staff both sides if you can, but I don't think that's what Trump did.

Election analysis.

The people in the suburbs of the biggest liberal cities, NY, Philly, DC, etc, not the closest suburbs, but the ones a little farther out there, 30 minutes - 45 minutes - moved a little to the left. Or, more specifically, there were some in those areas that shifted from R to D. Or maybe it was a turnout thing. GOP turnout was down or D turnout was up. Or a combination of all 3. Either way, the area that the GOP lost were those 45 minutes from NY or DC type places.

The GOP lost 26 seats as of now. Quick look.

Lost 2 in NY, 3 in NJ, 3 in PA, 1 NOVA. That's 9 right there, 1/3d of the total pickup, as basically NY - Philly - DC burbs. All the CDs are CDs between more rural red CDs and more urban blue CDs.

But the GOP picked up some Senate seats.

Win in North Dakota, Indiana, Missouri. Not entirely dominated by a big liberal city. More rural. But the GOP lost Nevada, increasingly dominated by Las Vegas.

I'm not going to go look at the data but I'd think that the GOP did well in rural areas. There were no new losses there, unless it was illegal immigrant rural.

So, all the stuff that has been happening, Kavanaugh or whatever, effected negatively in the suburbs of the liberal major cities and not bad in the more rural areas.

>>3779700

NYT has the House at 219 to 193, and the rest are too close to call.

Senate is GOP 51 GOP 45 Dem 4 too close to call.

>>3779738

No, it's not all about illegal aliens voting everywhere.

No, the suburyebs is where the NPCs live. Illegal immigrants well there's one CD that flipped to Dem in Arizona that looks like that, but the last year or 2 has been culture war, Soros style skits, and the like, and it worked in the suburbs of the major cities. And that's not a shock. Those CDs that the Dems picked up are CDs that the Dems won before. Not a shocker. It's pretty normal for midterms to go against the incumbent, and the culture war did help in North Dakota, Indiana, Missouri. I'm assuming the Kavanaugh no vote did not help in those more rural states without that major liberal city with growing suburbs.