>>3780352 (lb)

>Oh right, how could I forgot, the president may have pointed at a sign someone was holding once. That'll show the cabal.

This – seriously. I've had enough of all the meta stuff.

Yes, Q, we see there's media coverage of Q.

Yes, Q, it seems like a lot to be "all for a larp."

Yes, Q, we know you like to see people at rallies wearing Q shirts.

Yes, Q, these cryptic proofs sure are adding up.

Most of us are still here because we already think there's something to all of this. Now where do we go from here?

>>3780758

Except it's going to be 55-45

>>3780778

She's already made some noises about how any impeachment effort would need to be "bipartisan."

It's entirely possible that Pelosi's role in all of this will be to gently talk the Left off the ledge, let them down slowly, and provide a sober-headed, conciliatory narrative for the MSM to run with once the shit really starts to go down.