Regarding delta anon's analysis on /pol/
Don't get distracted by /pol/, which is a durable anonymous community that resists shilling through hard-nosed tactics. Let's not forget that /pol/ was the original Trump meme-engine, and that /pol/ existed LONG before CBTS, pizzagate, gamergate, or any other contemporary happenings. AI did not make epic anti-Clinton memes.
It is conceivable that /pol/ has been a incredible collection of training data for AI on how to achieve and maintain psychological momentum, but /pol/ itself is people who dig just like /qresearch/, and find connections. They dogpile on posts, because being an anon on /pol/ means you are an enforcer of board culture yourself. If you can't put up with gore, nazi webms, or smug anime girls, then you are, by definition, not /pol/. That's their measuring stick. They don't care about PR/optics, they don't care about your feelings. The notion that they gore/nazi post to keep normalfags out of their board is right on. /pol/ has survived being in the news media, with the subsequent normalfag firehose, all by driving people off.
/qresearch/ would benefit from employing a subset of /pol/ tactics against shills
Sure, don't be a nazifag. But do go read their rules thread with the resources to identify shills and how to fight them. You suffer here because you don't read about their tactics. And why? Because you're afraid you might get the nazi all over you? You won't.
Further. (answering the delta anon hypothesis) /pol/ "hates" you and calls you boomers because CBTS started flooding their board with shit, bringing reddit-tier culture, impatience, instant gratification hunger, and so they gave you a containment thread. You got too popular for them, bringing in more uninitiated normalfags, so you got banished to your own board. /pol/ likes it quiet so they can dig on happenings threads. This is exactly like you guys complain about influxes of normalfags when some youtube famefag "links in the description" or tweets about it.
/pol/ also "hates" you because you won't name the jew, which is their central red pill. It's a fact that freemasonry has jewish origins and talmud-like teachings. Is that anti-semetic? Does it invalidate everything /qresearch/ has found? No to both. Is the jewish representation in the executive leadership of news corporations anti-semetic? Reality isn't 100% the way /pol/ sees things, but neither is it 100% the way /qresearch/ sees things. You call a network of inter-related media companies, orchestrated by shadow orgs, supported by the deep state, enforced by clowns, controlled through the levers of the Roths the cabal. /pol/ sees the fight as class warfare, defined by cultural marxism (jewish), brought about by jewish scholars (Frankfurt school), enacted by jewish mainstream media, jewish hollywood, supported by legislators paid for by jewish AIPAC, enforced by a clown organization who's origin is jewish (look it up), and controlled by the jewish cabal (i.e. roths). The reality is that it's just one more tribal association along which to consolidate power. It's not THE tribe of power. That also doesn't mean you have to gas the kikes, race war now.
As for the rest of delta anon's hypothesis - that supercomputers are behind social media and pushing the narrative, that's likely largely right, through aggregated access through In-Q-Tel, etc. But /pol/ is not the enemy. They are just the old, crusty, battle-worn fags that protect your flank.