>>3782835
Thanks, anon.
I'm in the process of setting something up off 8ch to communicate with anons who want to talk.
Email and voice individually, but I am also looking into a board for group discussion.
I'll post later with contact info. Maybe not today, but soon.
Meanwhile: IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY SOMETHING
To make it easy, if you post on social media (or here), put #WHOISQ in your posts so we can search & gather. Thanks.
>>3782362
> This will make the 100th '' Q Not Really Real " article.
No.
Absolutely not.
The 100 articles about Q are written by LEFTISTS who hate Trump.
And, they're not any good.
Yes, they mock Q .... but they mock Trump and his supporters, too.
For the most part, they don't have facts.
Not a ONE of them gives any data or facts about the legitimacy (or not) of Q.
I think a couple of them bring up the photoshop tricks, but NONE give any solid evidence, none mention the passwords, none go into technical detail. (None of these writers know anything about tech anyway.)
This is different.
I'm not a leftist.
I can admit that I WANTED Q to be real.
I can also admit that I figured it out.
And I'm not printing a WORD until we can name names and print photos and give "Q" a chance to talk.
And then the game will be over.
>>3782362
> Lol. I know exactly that you are NOT a journalist. Try harder.
Can I quote you?
The goofball posts (like yours) only hurt the Q-hangers