>>3785154 (lb)

Why? Wisdom is wisdom. Something a friend of mine used to tell me over and over again, every time I made a mistake at work along my path:

"In 200 years, it's not going to matter!"

Now that's not a mantra I recommend picking up, by no means. What you can take form that though, is, do right by yourself and your family, and keep on pressing forward. There's a lot of wisdom in his skits. Separate the blackpilled from the wisdom in his standups. You'll be happy you did.

Call it, "Setting your expectations to reality".

>>3785255

That's nowhere near accurate as of 1 minute ago.

https://www.google.com/search?q=senate+election+results&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-ab

>>3785301

Just restating:

>Now that's not a mantra I recommend picking up, by no means. What you can take form that though, is, do right by yourself and your family, and keep on pressing forward.

The Roman Republic lasted, what, ~500 years?

The Roman Empire lasted, what, ~1500 years?

The point of the statement is to quit fretting over things beyond your control, really. The House was beyond our control, apparently, because we still have either have:

a. Division, not unity

b. Illegals voting

c. Some combination of both (likely)

Like I said in the last bread, I think it even surprised Q to an extent, but the reactionary responses from POTUS and Q both make it evident that the focus was the Senate. In this very rare (and should happen way more often) instance, Q actually said it first. Another part of this happening the way it did, is it opens up a problem area for Q to look into regarding unity and division in this country.

200 years from now, the landscape of this world will be what it's going to be beyond your control. Learn to cope with that, and focus on the important things in life.

>>3785547

Actually, white women are catching hell right now for how they voted (mostly R).

>>3785560

Let me ask you something. Think long and hard. Did you expect to lose the House? What does losing the House tell you about the state of race relations in this country? Because if you look at the way the demographics break down per votes in the House, there's a schism there that you, and I mean you personally, cannot fix. The point of the advice is "You cannot fix it, so concern yourself with things that are more important like yourself/family". That's the point.

>>3785763

Your example is proof positive of why it's a valid comparison. If you want to talk math, and how we don't understand it, have a look. It's really something everyone should be required to understand before running for office, or even being considered qualified for office, period: