Anonymous ID: 772c0d Q IS THE WORD Nov. 7, 2018, 7:47 p.m. No.3793739   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4198 >>4265

Are you Ready to be Proper Q'ed?

 

Lord's Prayer Change

306

Q !ITPb.qbhqo 9 Dec 2017 - 1:12:19 PM

News unlocks map.

Future proves past.

Why was the Lord's prayer posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

What just came out re: the Lord's prayer?

What can be connected?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Re-review the map post relevant news drops.

Godfather III.

Q

AND

Q 307

"Our Father who art in heaven,

Hallowed be thy name.

Thy kingdom come.

Thy will be done"

 

TO

Lord's Prayer Change a Tangent

308

Q

!ITPb.qbhqo

9 Dec 2017 - 1:21:38 PM

Tangent

Expand your thinking.

Q

TO

In biblical criticism, the prayer's absence in the Gospel of Mark together with its occurrence in Matthew and Luke has caused scholars who accept the two-source hypothesis (against other document hypotheses) to conclude that it is probably a logion original to Q.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord%27s_Prayer

TO

The Q source (also Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's Oral Tradition.

 

For centuries, biblical scholars followed the Augustinian hypothesis: that the Gospel of Matthew was the first to be written, Mark used Matthew in the writing of his, and Luke followed both Matthew and Mark in his (the Gospel of John is quite different from the other three, which because of their similarity are called the Synoptic Gospels). Nineteenth-century New Testament scholars who rejected Matthew's priority in favor of Markan priority speculated that Matthew's and Luke's authors drew the material they have in common with the Gospel of Mark from Mark's Gospel. But Matthew and Luke also share large sections of text not found in Mark. They suggested that neither Gospel drew upon the other, but upon a second common source, termed Q

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

TO

The term logia (Greek: λόγια), plural of logion (Greek: λόγιον), is used variously in ancient writings and modern scholarship in reference to communications of divine origin. In pagan contexts, the principal meaning was "oracles", while Jewish and Christian writings used logia in reference especially to "the divinely inspired Scriptures". A famous and much-debated occurrence of the term is in the account by Papias of Hierapolis on the origins of the canonical Gospels. Since the 19th century, New Testament scholarship has tended to reserve the term logion for a divine saying, especially one spoken by Jesus, in contrast to narrative, and to call a collection of such sayings, as exemplified by the Gospel of Thomas, logia.

AND

Papias of Hierapolis composed around AD 100 a work, now lost, entitled Exegesis of the Dominical Logia, which Eusebius quotes as an authority on the origins of the Gospels of Mark and Matthew.[6][7]

On Mark, Papias cites John the Elder

The Elder used to say: Mark, in his capacity as Peter’s interpreter, wrote down accurately as many things as he recalled from memory—though not in an ordered form—of the things either said or done by the Lord. For he neither heard the Lord nor accompanied him, but later, as I said, Peter, who used to give his teachings in the form of chreiai, but had no intention of providing an ordered arrangement of the logia of the Lord. Consequently Mark did nothing wrong when he wrote down some individual items just as he related them from memory. For he made it his one concern not to omit anything he had heard or to falsify anything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logia

 

TO

 

''' The text contains a possible allusion to the death of Jesus in logion 65[10] (Parable of the Wicked Tenants, paralleled in the Synoptic Gospels), but does not mention his crucifixion, his resurrection, or the final judgment; nor does it mention a messianic understanding of Jesus.[11][12] Since its discovery, many scholars have seen it as evidence in support of the existence of the so-called Q source, which might have been very similar in its form as a collection of sayings of Jesus without any accounts of his deeds or his life and death, a so-called "sayings gospel".[13]

 

Bishop Eusebius included it among a group of books that he believed to be not only spurious, but the fictions of heretics '''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas

 

Q is the word… the source… the original OG…

 

I believe I know what the original Brotherhood found at the Temple…

 

Sure sure all of this conspiracy flying about covering pretty much everything yet not muh bible? kekistan! :D

 

Now you have ALL been PROPER Q'ed! :D

 

NOTABLE AF BAKER KEK

Trust Qzilla as Qzilla loves you :D

Anonymous ID: 772c0d Nov. 7, 2018, 8:40 p.m. No.3794391   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3794198

don't you mean NOTHING TO SEE HERE or SHUT IT DOWN SHUT IT DOWN!!! gwen kekistefani!

 

I can see what you are saying since you brought so much to the table to counter my OBSERVATION PILGRIM

 

bwahahah suck it! :D