As a research board and not a discussion group, what are we suppose to make of Q's drop re: martial law? Are we to conclude that Martial Law, and its suspension of habeus corpus, is imminent because rebellion is about to break out?
Lets begin by oddsfagging it. Wikipedia references about a dozen times that martial law has been invoked. A dozen instances in 242 years of American history is 12/242 =.05= 5% historical odds of Martial Law occurring in any one year. 95% chance, using historical odds, that it won't happen in any given year. So, to turn a phrase, fat chance.
Less clear are the odds of any one post of q's being "right". For example, Q doesn't make any claims in last night's post about Martial law, notwithstanding that, in context, it is laden with innuendo. That said, my experience with Q "predictions" is that they don't come true much more often than they do. As is well known on this board, that can be because of the intentional use of disinformation, or Q seeking leverage on a foe from the threat of an outcome, or a need to keep his audience interested- whatever.
So the oddsfag conclusion is: Martial law being declared is possible, but thats not the way to bet it.