Anonymous ID: 0af026 Nov. 8, 2018, 6:23 a.m. No.3798802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8858 >>8874 >>8949 >>8968

Grab a cup of covfefe & listen up Patriotanons.

Why was (The Senate) so important?

Q mentioned the Judiciary Committee ref. DOJ & DECLAS issues.

 

But there's Moar. Something was nagging @ me.

I was reminded of another [Major] obstacle "The Cabal" - Gov Bureaucracy throws @ 'The Plan':

(Federal Judges) Compromised, Corrupt, "Owned" Pedo Judges.

Q has mentioned, "How do you prosecute justice if the Fed. Judiciary, DOJ & FBI are CORRUPT?

 

So I went back & reviewed POTUS's JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS.

MAJOR ROADBLOCK SENATE APPROVAL PROCESS.

If Dem's have an advantage in the Senate they can Perpetually block Judicial Appointments.

 

The Cabal has had (((their))) [Minions] running our (Fed Court System) for years to "Legitimize" (((their))) "Enactments of Tyranny" & to Cover-Up (((their))) crimes.

(Evaluate the Situation)

(Wikipedia - some numbers)

There are currently 57 nominations to Article III courts [awaiting Senate action], including 7 for the Courts of Appeals, 48 for the District Courts, and 2 for the Court of International Trade. There are currently 11 vacancies on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 111 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade, and 20 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump's first term (4 for the Courts of Appeals and 16 for District Courts).

  • Notice - [awaiting Senate action]

 

PLEASE READ THIS CLOSELY TO SEE HOW IT APPLIES TO Q's COMMENTS ABOUT THE SENATE.

(Business Insider article - Jul 2017)

"What strikes me about the Trump administration's judicial-nomination process is how quickly they have moved," Coons said.

 

But there's a catch.

 

Of those 55 nominees, 45 are from — or nominated for jobs in — states Trump won outright in last fall's election. If you remove the positions based in Washington, DC, that number becomes 45 of 48, a remarkably high 94%. Just 64% of Obama's initial nominees hailed from states he carried in the 2008 presidential election.

 

And there's a reason for that.

 

It's known as the "blue slip," or the [consent of both home-state senators]. And it's Senate tradition to not advance any judicial or US attorney nominee without having the blue slip.

Notice - [Blue Slip] [consent of both home-state senators]*

 

In states with two Republican senators, Trump has made 30 of his 55 nominations. In states with two Democratic senators, he has nominated five. And four of those are for circuit court or Court of Federal Claims openings, positions for which Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said the blue-slip rule is not quite as important in comparison to district judgeships.

 

Please remember what "Our Guys" are up against.

I could tell from POTUS's body language yesterday @ news conf. ref. Jim Acosta he was Pissed = Because he knows how EVIL these people are & how much (((they))) HATE us & the USA.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-judges-attorneys-nominations-2017-7

Anonymous ID: 0af026 Nov. 8, 2018, 6:35 a.m. No.3798949   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3798802

>In states with two Republican senators, Trump has made 30 of his 55 nominations. In states with two Democratic senators, he has nominated five. And four of those are for circuit court or Court of Federal Claims openings, positions for which Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said the blue-slip rule is not quite as important in comparison to district judgeships.

———

And, (Wikipedia numbers) notice: The Ninth Circuit = radical, libtard court High number of "Stalled" appointments.

 

9th Circuit = CALIFORNIA. Hmmm