>>3798353 (pb)

I don't disagree with this analysis–and thank you, anon, for going through it so carefully–but the election was daunting because it showed how very much of the country is still in sway to the Dems, and passionately so. How can the Awakening find its way to them? This task, even more than draining the swamp, seems overwhelming. How can progress be made, beyond memes, which are great!

>>3798854 (pb)

True words, anon. You speak for many, many people.

However, Q's saying "these people are stupid" should not be taken as an invitation to underestimate the enemy, but perhaps as a signal that there is yet hope. Powerful elites have been taken down many times in world history, and what we are working and hoping for–IMO–is that this can be accomplished in our nation today, but without bloody revolution and using the structures of our constitution and law.

Teacherfag here, and yesterday I was helping a 7th grader understand the basics of the Constitutional Convention. One point (from a secondary source) was that the framers knew that it had never been done to create your own government structure from scratch (rather than wind up with a government via "war or chance"). And they knew that the world was watching, and that if they failed to make and agree to a workable constitution, even with all the grievous compromises they had to make re. slavery, then the doubters would be proved right, and everyone would say, "See, we TOLD you people can't just make their own government." They had won the war against Britain, but now they needed to make it work using a method never used before.

Are we / Q / DJT / Patriots not trying to do the same? Restore justice and responsibility, unseat decades of corrupt elites, but do so peacefully and lawfully, when perhaps such a thing has never been done on this scale?

Don't underestimate the power of our enemy–earthly or eternal–but do have hope. Don't give up.