She can retire now. From her own words (pic).
At her age and the rib injuries, she'll be lucky if she recovers within a year. 6 months minimum. Time for her to give it up and move on.
Keep it up liberals. Your chances of a 2020 will get even slimmer with your constant crying. The rest of the American population is getting tired of it.
>likely unlawful
Likely? What kind of court is this that doesn't know their asses from their elbows?
Don't forget the possible pipe bomb
Authorities are investigating reports of a possible pipe bomb in Thurston county in Washington state.
The Seattle branch of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said it was sending a dog and handler to the incident at the I-5 overpass on 113th Avenue South.
Washington State Patrol bomb squad is also responding to the incident.
A resident is said to have reported seeing something suspicious while driving in the 3900 block of 113th,
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/seattle-pipe-bomb-thurston-county-washington-update-latest-overpass-a8624901.html
>President Obama waited to issue an executive order on immigration because, he said, he wanted Congress to act. When Congress failed to act, he issued several, including what is known as DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Was his action constitutional?
President Obama waited to issue an executive order on immigration because he understood he did not have lawful authority to countermand an Act of Congress. The decision of Congress not to enact legislation a president wants is no excuse for acting unilaterally. I realize DACA has a lot of support. I support the policy myself, and hope Congress enacts it in some form. Children brought to this country by their parents, and raised in this country, are very sympathetic candidates for admission. But the Constitution gives Congress, not the President, the power to make and to amend the laws. If President Trump called on Congress to change the environmental laws and Congress refused, this would not give Trump power to dispense with enforcement of the laws by executive action.
>What are the potential legal actions that might be taken at this point, if any, regarding DACA?
Creative lawyers may come up with a challenge to President Trump’s revocation of DACA, but it is hard to imagine what it would be based on. That is one problem with unilateral executive action. What is done by one president by the stroke of a pen can be undone by the next president.
>President Obama’s lawyers defended his actions as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Why was that not correct, or was it?
The DACA and DAPA orders went well beyond the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. They purported to give their beneficiaries a form of lawful presence, entitling them to work permits and a variety of government benefits. Prosecutorial discretion means the executive will not take legal action against a law breaker in a particular case; it does not make the conduct lawful. So the answer: No.
https://law.stanford.edu/2017/09/06/michael-mcconnell-on-executive-orders-daca-and-the-constitution/
Looks like it was just a memorandum
>Under an executive order signed by President John F. Kennedy, an executive order must cite the authority the president has to issue it. That could be the constitution, or a specific statute. Presidential memoranda have no such requirement. … A presidential memorandum can be changed with another memorandum.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/01/24/executive-order-vs-presidential-memorandum-whats-difference/96979014/
>The Obama administration chose to deploy DACA by Executive Branch memorandum—despite the fact that Congress affirmatively rejected such a program in the normal legislative process on multiple occasions. The constitutionality of this action has been widely questioned since its inception.
https://www.dhs.gov/deferred-action-childhood-arrivals-daca