>>3802877 (lb)
No, YOUR post is a low IQ post.
It turns out they have deceived us about the "sealed indictments). The 60k number is sealed proceedings, whereas the 1k they compare it with is sealed indictments in criminal cases. Apples and oranges. And when you compare apples and apples, it turns out the 60k number isn't unusual at all. Not in the least. Perfectly normal and unremarkable. As if nothing in particular is going on.
This is not what we've been led to believe, but it is the TRUTH.
This ordeal disturbs me greatly, especially because Q has gone all in on the Huber + 470 = 50k+ narrative. I know "disinfo is necessary", but this makes me wonder if there's ANYTHING Q says I can trust…
Agreed. Good attitude.
That could be true. I'm just wondering why we haven't organized a proper dig on this. Why haven't we went through PACER on previous years for ALL districts, so we can say for certain if there is anything unusual going on anywhere?
I can't answer for you, but for myself, I simply trusted the anons who claimed to be taking care of this dig. Turns out this trust was misplaced.
You say he uses cherry picked results, and I wish to believe you. So where is the full PACER results for the year before Huber's supposed 470 getting to work? It seems to me we forgot to actually find out. As autistic digging goes, that's kind of pathetic really.
Yes sure, but it seems NO-ONE has done any proper digging on the indictments. NO-ONE has been able to post a comparison where a district has a massive surge from one year to another. At least not that I'm aware of. The group of anons who volunteered to dig on this for us have failed to do a proper job, and we all foolishly just took their words for it.
In personally made this the cornerstone of my conviction Q is real. Foolish, I know, but there it is. Now I need to find another way to convince myself, or bail. It sucks.
Please point me to this debunking. I seriously want to see it and be convinced.