>>3803563 (lb)

The shitty blog I linked may be riddled with inconsistencies. I don't care. The point is that he points out that our much vaunted sealed indictment count is also riddled with inconsistencies, and he happens to be 100 % correct about that.

That's what I care about here. My agenda is to get to the truth, whatever it happens to be. If there are more sealed indictments than usual I want to know. If there aren't, I also want to know. What I don't want, is being told over and over by both anons and Q that there are more sealed indictments than usual, and then be given a fraudulent proof.

The truth is, we don't have any hard evidence! The people who claim to handle this digging have not done a proper job, they have misled us all. When I point this out here, a bunch of people say it's notable and that we NEED to find out the truth about these indictments, but the baker doesn't make it a notable anyway.

Seems this community isn't into digging for truth after all. Color me disappoint.

>>3803716

Nowhere that I know of. I've been following this closely since day one, checking notables twice daily, and the only time I heard of it was when an enemy site was debunking our claims.

That just ain't good.

>>3803925

Where is this "current evidence"? I wish to see it.

That is, I want to see evidence there are more sealed proceeding since Huber and his 470 started working. A comparison with the same time period the year before is the natural way to prove this. So far I've never seen this proof, and the only time I've seen anyone attempt to make a random sample testing a couple of districts, it came up negative. Not reassuring at all.

PLEASE, link us to this proof! It would help our argument tremendously to be able to show it to people!

>>3804203

Yes, Q has specifically called it 50k+ sealed indictments on several occasions.

But they aren't sealed indictments. They're simply sealed documents of any kind, a small percentage of which are sealed indictments.

I find it disturbing that anons created this false narrative, and doubly troubling that Q runs with it.