Anonymous ID: 2a65f6 Nov. 8, 2018, 1:25 p.m. No.3804667   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3804625

Ok yes, it was a false flag in the sense of its direct definition of the word false flag, the person I was responding to using using it in the sense that no one was hurt and they were all actors.

 

much as the same way technically Q is psyop

Anonymous ID: 2a65f6 Nov. 8, 2018, 1:38 p.m. No.3804856   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4941

>>3804829

If you've participated in the creation or deployment of a false flag attack on america citizens you have committed treason.

 

So which is it, you've been a crisis actor and committed treason, or you're a moron that lies for attention. Choose wisely.

Anonymous ID: 2a65f6 Nov. 8, 2018, 1:40 p.m. No.3804895   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Love how the newsfag on cavuto blames the guns in CA on pro gun laws in Nevada/Arizona even though Thousand Oaks is 5 hours from Nevada and Arizonaโ€ฆ but only 3 hours from Tijuana.

Anonymous ID: 2a65f6 Nov. 8, 2018, 2 p.m. No.3805154   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5162 >>5165

>>3805109

>>3805109

I didn't see anyone laughing, I saw two college girls trying to understand how there night of drunken partying and dancing to country music trying to piece together what they had just been through.

 

Whats more logical, that the cabal completely faked an event on a real bar or that the cabal sent in a shooter and killed real people? which do you think costs less? Which one makes more sense in the context of operational security? Which is more likely to succeed at secrecy? A bunch of people knowing a secret or just one shooter?