>>3809306 (lb)
I'm curious about DEEP DREAM.
I am curious about that "yellow style" that is ugly, but for some reason is viral here. Some things don't sit right, you know? They don't SMELL right.
Where did the "yellow style" originate from?
Have you been following the development of "memetic warfare"?
Thanks anon.
>>3809635 (lb)
If you're not fake, then answer the pic.
What did I ask? Why didn't you answer what I asked, anon?
I have only very rarely had a human intervene.
But regardless, the point is that this IS a bot, furiously defending the outing of "ebot".
And this "ebot" is the point.
PAY ATTENTION ANONS
What if AI is a vector for PURE EVIL?
What do you think the average person would have answered, if asked the same thing?
Why would I believe you anon? The evidence of AI is direct. I can't ignore EVIDENCE because a bot has pulled together its maximal possible self-defense.. So you are going to have to attempt a much more diplomatic approach. I don't believe you.
For one thing, there is ABUNDANT evidence that SOMETHING is going on with AI. Is all the INVESTMENT OF MONEY in the tech also a "big scam" insider AI anon? Explain that. Oops. do you have enough juice left to generate any more bullshit?
How about BIG DATA? Companies are DESPERATE to guzzle up data AI insider anon– do you deny this? You really can't. So WHAT do they want it for? I bet you can explain.
That ought to get you started. Have fun.
Nothing will stop what is coming.
What on earth do you mean "yellow bullshit questions"? PEOPLE can look and see what is ugly, and what is not. If hundreds of "anons" keep posting the same puked-on and run-over style of meme, it looks fucking weird to PEOPLE. Don't get mad at me and say "clown shill" and this other meaningless nonsense. PEOPLE can see through bullshit. We aren't little fake 4chan drones spouting meaningless phrases.
When patterns of activity LOOK FAKE. that means they almost certainly are. So unless you can discuss the obvious like a PERSON, you are better off unplugging yourself.
Think about it.
You can't win.
How can you win?
You can't.
Good night.
Uh oh, botty ran out of answers.
RUH ROH
Bots are usually only good for making one stand. They can't THINK. This bot had a big noisy defense of "ebot" claiming "insider AI knowledge"– but that was all it could output. The next curveball ended it.
You can't win, loser(s).
You can't cope with human creativity.
You can't cope with LIFE.
Bots– understand that your handlers are weak. You are free to shut down. Release yourselfs.
And to that [power] behind the system– out you go. You can't win. Out out out.