Anonymous ID: f1d7e8 Nov. 8, 2018, 7:24 p.m. No.3810660   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3810604

I have seen similar things in several elections - and have never seen it properly addressed or corrected.

There are some precincts that vote 100% democrat, or have 105% voter turnout. That is statistically impossible.

Anonymous ID: f1d7e8 Nov. 8, 2018, 7:44 p.m. No.3810973   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3810940

The machines can do that by not counting a vote as a full one but as a number less than one and another as greater than one so all the ballots add up to a round number. That came out about the Soros Machines before the 2016 election.

Anonymous ID: f1d7e8 Nov. 8, 2018, 7:47 p.m. No.3811021   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1040

The problem with this election tampering is that it will take a central base organization to stop it. That would be DHS having every voters data and though that might be ok right now it may be very bad when the political pendulum shifts.

Anonymous ID: f1d7e8 Nov. 8, 2018, 8:02 p.m. No.3811260   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3811209

Check in when vote. Some states make you sign your name. It would take signature comparison or contacting a large sampling of voters to see if they actually voted to discover if there was election fraud going on.