>>3812493

Our elections have really gone to hell. I remember Bush v. Gore was about some hard to read ballots in FL. But at least there's no dispute that they were actual ballots. An honest difference of opinion and incentive.

Now we have massive amounts of brand new manufactured Dem ballots just being thrown on the file with some bogus excuse that, if you dismiss it, you're a racist.

Or like in 2016 in Detroit, which we know due to Jill Stein's recount, inner city ballots (Dem overwhelmingly) were run thru the counting machine 6 or more times each. If they'd done it 10 times instead, Hillary might have won Michigan.

And it seems there's no way to stop it. Just get a Dem controlled government, it's a state level issue, and you just have to accept whatever they come up with at the end even when the fraud is obvious.

Trump won in 2016. But demographic change won't give us much longer. Dems will join Trump if they see it (work and productivity) as their best option. But many will go back to free stuff if they can get that instead. I'll keep trying, we all will, but I don't assume success.

>>3813003

Speaking of state level, Pam Bondi (R) is Sec. of State in FL isn't she? Why wasn't there better control on what's going on in Broward and Palm Beach Counties? Did Bondi do her job?

>>3812877

True, he actually loses quite a few of those arguments he provokes on his show, but butts in to talk over people.

Who else do we have? Could they get Limbaugh? O'Reilly is not allowed back apparently. Remember Rupert Murdoch runs Fox, he may not want strong conservatives there.

>>3813025

OK we'll see if she had enough surveillance or whatever to push back on it. I don't know what she should have done. FL is a tough weird place. But it was her job.

>>3813032

Hard to believe Acosta was any sort of intelligence asset. He's thick as a brick, just rude and loud. I think they're sorry to see him go because he was so easy to make fun of.

What really surprises me is that CNN is so mad to lose him. They should be relieved and provide a sharper, smoother reporter there. But they seem genuinely mad.

>>3813093

He was easy for Trump, that's why he was allowed 2 or 3 questions. I saw Trump jump away from certain much more polite but cleverer reporters last night, after only 1 question, because the line they were going down was not what he wanted to talk about.

Trump never minded scolding Acosta and calling his network Fake News. That was easy, comic relief. Even i could handle a press conference full of Jim Acosta's without too much trouble, but not so with some of the sharper people.