>>3812101 lb

Anon, I agree with you here:

>WWII is a fucking lie.

>911 is a fucking lie.

>Anything short of elminating the criminals in the media and rewriting the history books and have them based on TRUTH.

>IS UNACCEPTABLE

This is why I push the JQ often and have pushed hard that it continues to be a topic that is considered non-negotiable as to whether we "tone it down" to appease normies. No, we don't apologize for the truth. Our job is to be blunt and direct about it. As autists, we can do nothing BUT be honest. Someone needs to bring the world out of the darkness of communist-state-enforced ignorance. If not us, who?

The question is whether to trust that Q/POTUS are on board for real/full truth given that they haven't 100% spelled it out yet. I have a shit ton of reasons to believe they are, not just from proofs here, but from my prior work. But I'm a scientist, we're never 100% certain about anything. As researchers, we learn to take in data along multiple possible paths, and to investigate them in parallel. During my time contracting for defense, when we had to navigate blackhat vs. whitehat fuggery, I was trained to apply that multi-path technique to business/politics. Mentor said always work with a minimum of 4 possible scenarios, combinations of likely answers to unknowns–be they motives of players or the yea/nay on a pending patent application. And then to choose actions as though moving in four parallel universes, so that you stay alive and relevant and flexible should any of those 4 scenarios play out when all the unknowns have finally been revealed

Regarding this movement, I try to act such that my moves serve my ultimate purpose (truth/freedom/justice for all) IF Q is legit, and IF he's not–2 paths. Since my certainty for legit is high, I weight my time-investment (and emotional investment) for the Q-is-legit path highly, but I'm also mindful that the way I participate not thwart my ultimate purpose should Q prove false.

Could we do better spreading the word outside QR and its SocMed extensions? For my money, no. The spread of our memes and influence is evident–we've long since outgrown our "basket," and have gone from "deplorables" to "information terrorists." (kek!) We are building and training an army of citizen journalists and digital warriors–that is valuable in its own right. This is why we must protect not only free speech here, but the culture and core personality type that sustained it in a world where everyone else had long since sold out.

On the small chance Q is false, the motive would likely be to get the remaining stubborn band of hold-outs to willingly surrender “hate speech” in the name of "unity" or "healing" etc. And yes, we know (((who))) would be behind such a plot. Q may urge that we band together for strength, but he's never told us certain topics are off limits. This is why I'm still on the Q train. I'm as eager for swift justice as the next patriot, but I'm okay with the diligent, step-wise pace–especially since it's so generously explained along the way by Q–and I understand why disinfo is necessary. What matters most to us, to our role, is that Q is giving us a voice, not shutting it.

Finally, I've said this before and will say again, my mentor redpilled me on lots of things in my training, and he was woke to the JQ. I think there's a good chance the Mil guys I contracted for (in the aughts) were working on the early stages of the Q plan–getting their defense ducks in a row (I was in bioterrorism countermeasures) before they began the offense stage (with Trump in 2015). Whatever Kushner’s role and Q’s plan for how to solve the Jewish problem, they’re aware it exists.