Anonymous ID: 5103ff Nov. 9, 2018, 6:18 a.m. No.3816248   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6340

>>3816207

>I'm obviously happy about the direction of the economy, but if you aren't following the big picture then yeahโ€ฆ.my life and money situation has changed precisely 0% since POTUS' election, other than it becoming more dangerous for me to express my views in public.I'm not complaining, just illustrating that MUH ECONOMY meant fuck all to me, personally, and I'm sure there are plenty of other voters who similarly saw no change at all in their lives.Not everyone is unemployed or a small business owner.

 

If it wasn't a big deal, then Obama wouldn't have taken credit for it.

Anonymous ID: 5103ff Nov. 9, 2018, 6:29 a.m. No.3816356   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6386

>>3816340

>That is completely irrelevant.Obviously it is a big deal, and is a big positive.What I am saying is that in reality and in application, the economic gains have not touched very large portions of the population in any meaningful way.So unless they are the type to read Thomas Sowell and swoon over jobs numbers and GDP growth, they probably aren't going to be overly impressed.

 

That sounds like their fault. Money flow is everything.

Anonymous ID: 5103ff Nov. 9, 2018, 6:34 a.m. No.3816401   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6439

>>3816386

>Well unfortunately they vote too, so you may have to descend from your ivory tower and bless them with your holy gifts so they may be as prosperous as you.What a stupid fucking attitude to have.

 

kek. I'm not in an ivory tower. i'm just stating a moving economy is good for everyone. the kind of "have/have not" scenario you're talking about is even worse when the rich don't invest.

Anonymous ID: 5103ff Nov. 9, 2018, 6:42 a.m. No.3816478   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3816439

>Jesus you are denseโ€ฆ.I am not nor have I ever been talking about whether or not the economy is good for them or not.The OP was bitching about votes, and people not being motivated to vote because of the economy.I commented that while I can appreciate the success intangibly, there isn't a true effect that it has had on my life or many others like me.Therefore, what the OP was saying was true, that many people who are not otherwise informed have not realized any real benefits from the early economic success, and thus have not been heavily motivated by that talking point yet.We are discussing what motivates people to support POTUS or vote, and why the economic message isn't as powerful yet as it may be eventually. You are so fucking puddle brained you picked up on about 5% of that content and then imagined the rest of the conversation and started debating with a position no one was taking..

 

We're debating now? I've said like two lines. Cash flow is good. That's it. I don't give a shit about debating it. It's true.