>>3809072 pb notable
Quibble with this ^^^^
Analyst who wrote Notable portrays Comey as a good guy just caught in the FBI ["What could he do?" being in the FBI , to paraphrase]
For one, Comey was in charge, could do what he wanted, which he did. Remember he exonerated HRC of criminality, said there would be no indicted, and was criticized for that since such determination is not in his purview ?. Remember he was criticized for going off bounds? Off his legal mandate which is not prosecutorial but only investigative?.
For two, he was one of the conspirators to frame POTUS
He leaked a memo to the NYTimes for that very purpose.
I'm not going to argue further since anyone who is an ANON and had been following along, would know these things already.
Comey's criminal activity goes back decades.
He's also suspected of being part of the group who have been trying to kill POTUS
Any attempt , as this previous assigned "NOTABLE" author made, to portray J. Comey as "on the fence" is completely wrong.
NOT Notable Baker.
This show up why I don't trust Notables. And why I believe there is a large faction of alleged anon Patriots who are still very deep in the dark.
Perhaps Bader-Ginsberg held on to her seat until she felt safer, since Dems allegedly won the house [it was announced], and they are all feeling safe after that? Perhaps Bader felt being a sitting Justice would provide her with legal immunity to specific accusations [Tarmac related?] so she held on as long as she could?
^^^^The writer doesn't conclude anything close to that, but sort of circles around that notion.
There are many other possible scenarios around Ginsburg.
And none make J. Comey an innocent player, because he isn't.
I think there are some very clever, likely CIA operatives, who are getting their shit put into Notables, using Baker accomplices.
They [Clowns] are so much bigger than us.
That's why they own all the other news outlets.
I ignore, but not so much when it's in Notables
Did you see Comey go around to all the talk shows after he was fired and play innocent, and speak against Pres. Trump?
If he was a good guy, victim of circumstance, and just "on the fence" why we he fired to clean the Agency and attempt to restore public trust.
Why would he publicly state that the USA citizen has no right to privacy and never did?
That is a Capital crime
"Taking away people's rights under color of Law"
Dude needs Gitmo fast, before his plans to kill DJT bear fruit.
What were they planning?
-
No right to privacy. Must answer any question [5 amendment to Consitiution - and there's a reason for it most have forgotten]
-
Take away guns.
What were their plans?