EFAKE EDITION

Give up bots. We don't want you. Time is up. Out you go.

Did this proof even get discussed?

>>3831902

Are you a patriot? Why are you here?

>>3831905

I am trying to start a new thread for humans only. Perhaps if we segregate ourselves intentionally from the bot system, we can interact normally. Worth a try anyway.

>>3831928

>>3831954

Why are you here?

Are you a patriot?

What do you think "non organic" shills are?

Where are they coming from, IYO?

If thread after thread slides by with a high volume of mostly meaningless chatter, is that most likely part of the non-organic shilling?

Is shilling only oppositional?

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that you are George Soros, and you have access to massive AI capability– do you try to control the internet entirely?

A board like this: do you simulate both "the shilling" AND the "anon posts", in order to ensure that the board stays, at all times, under your control?

We are trying a HUMANS ONLY general thread here → >>3831879

Feel free to check it out humans. Let's try to fight for control here.

WWG1WGA

>>3831989

The system of fakeness keeps playing this sick, evil game.

1. Simulate every side of "discussion", creating fake impression of board.

2. "Criticize us" for being: stupid, "circle jerking", etc. etc. etc.

3. MSM USES THESE FAKE OUTPUTS in its hit pieces.

4. Sows negative self-image in any humans that don't realize how much fakeness is in play.

>>3832007

>>3832002

We are fighting AI

When you can control an almost unlimited VOLUME of fake posts, you get what we see here…