Anonymous ID: 06293e Nov. 10, 2018, 7:53 a.m. No.3833668   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4142

Another anon lb pointed out 2 Sundance articles wondering if he was “seeing the light.” After reading them, I’m more convinced Sundance is not on our side.

The older article espouses the danger of Q to POTUS while the newer article hints there is something unknown combating the DS but he can’t tell us what it is ‘yet.’ The “Q is dangerous” article makes false connections (Q says POTUS knew Whittaker and now he has to vehemently deny the accusations because of the Q larp). He also says Q is only dangerous now because DS lost their leverage in a recused Sessions. That’s probably the truest statement in that article.

DS is scared and are now activating deeper assets. Think back- who was one of the first people claiming Mueller was a white hat? Who pointed out Mueller was ineligible to be FBI director yet had an interview with POTUS for the position and then told us it was really about the SC? Sundance.

I know it’s not perfect reasoning, but he’s been unsettling me more and more for the past half year or so and it’s hard to pin down exactly why. Just this anon’s thoughts, but don’t be surprised if Sundance comes out with his own Q crumb connections soon to discredit Q.

Anonymous ID: 06293e Nov. 10, 2018, 8:16 a.m. No.3833964   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3833917

 

I submitted one too but no response yet. I did not ask for a fee waiver because the # of pages I expected would fall within the pre-waived costs and I knew it would extend the response time. Hopefully see something soon.