>>3840305 (lb)
they did see it and they did call it. The outcome was not effected by it so there was no legal recourse at that time
looks like a reasonable assumption. Double and multiple meanings could be at play. 2/3 of Cali voting illegally also makes sense to me for many districts.
Q is POTUS calling out a 3:1 ratio of illegal votes?
>>3840627 the short answer to your question is yes if set intentionally as we believe. Look at the Authorization Use Military Force signed on 9/18/01
Question: Why have we never had a comprehensive immigration law done?
Answer: Because Congress cannot write a law that vetoes the power of the Executive branch and immigration/ border security is strictly in the control of our POTUS INS v Chadha
CHECKMATE
>>3840827 If you exclude the illegal voters, Cox won
POTUS has passed all of the legislation he needed to in order to keep his promises. What he needs now is his cabinet filled and his Judges passed. The Congress doesn't mean a thing for the next 2 years! He will take investigation PR hits from them and swat them away like the irritating gnats they are. Come 2020 and a legit census report is filed, California loses their Congressional seats and the silent sufferers TAKE BACK THEIR STATE
POTUS threw out a 10% tax cut to middle class and the Dems will be the ones holding it up now. He knew that! 2018 might not have met OUR expectations of GLORIOUS but we don't sit in his chair! They get the house and all of the baggage that goes with it while we get the Senate and see a new phase of POTUS focus on winning!
do you have an intelligent rebuttal for me or are you going to rely on insults as your position?