>if DECLAS had occurred before midterms then voter fraud would not have occurred due to D's resigning and no one voting for D party
thats nonsense
>if DECLAS had occurred before midterms then voter fraud would not have occurred due to D's resigning and no one voting for D party
thats nonsense
declas of the FISA WARRANT has nothing to do with democratic members of the house
what is declas'd is what the FBI/DOJ/C_A did
all the faggot D's in congress won easily, their constituents don't give a fuck, they WANT what they're doing
not to mention this has nothing to do with fraud, it would've happened anyway
>If DECLAS had occurred before midterms then voter fraud would not have occurred due to D's resigning and no one voting for D party.
^^
nonsensical rationalization
DECLAS WILL HAPPEN WHEN POTUS WANTS IT TO, which was after the midterms
>Sealed indictments are separate from FISA declas.
>Declas catches a few and grabs the nation's attention.
>The indictments happen anyway.
I know with all of that
but the declas of the FISA warrant would have NOT made D's resign or changed a significant amount of votes, imo
when gay questions like you're asking are asked
a good example of what nigger?
<muh comped bakers, muh comped BV, muh comped BO
well played anon