Was it because of a protest or was it because guys out for a walk one night decided they'd kill some Americans?
What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?
HRC, under questioning at Congressional Benghazi hearing.
SCOTUS NINE
Across jurisprudence there are nine shouts.
Pres Trump may yet appoint a complement of six Justices before he is done.
Regarding Q Post 2231:
Why are we here?
Anagram: We were her hay.
Hay = fodder.
We were her cannon fodder.
Pic: confirmation with sauces.
NEVER FORGIVE, NOT DOCTORING, STUPID QUESTION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al4iqHFhvCQ
EVERYTHING HAS MEANING
>>3819245 ob
Here is the description/ guide for the infographics regarding Q Post 2231.
There are two anagrams that fall out of phrasings in this Q Post.
SUN to SHINE
and
Why are we here?
Below are examples of deciphering. Later I touch on Gematria, but none of that is necessary to resolve these anagrams when context is kept in mind. One can draw on history as well.
WHY ARE WE HERE? This question suggests an answer is to be sought in light of the events of September 2018. This includes the nomination of another Supreme Court Justice. But also, in September, the anniversary of the disaster of 9/11. How did we get here? There are hints the question will not be resolved until after "Armistice Day".
p1.
Q 2231
The first the other anagram:
SUN to SHINE contains the phrase, NINE SHOUTS. The Supreme Court is comprised of nine Justices and their influence across generations gives to each Justice a loud voice in our form of government and, in our times, also in our national culture.
Given the tone of our politics, there is also the cacophony of raised voices, or at least loud voices, during the process of electioneering on, lobbying for, and selecting, vetting, and approving appointments to the Court. That includes during presidential and senatorial campaigns, but also during Senate hearings between elections. The SHOUTS may refer to Justices or to the process of appointment of Justice. NINE SHOUTS?
By their votes on decisions, by their influence in chambers, and by their written opinions, the NINE have voices that echo long and loudly. Like SHOUTS. And they answer hard questions. The potential for long lasting effect heard far and wide is very significant.
Interestingly, the date and the time on Q Post 2231 can be used to further confirm that the use of "NINE" is attached to the Supreme Court. The date is Sep 20, 7 / 20, which can be resolved to 7 +2 = 9. And the time stamp is 12:53, which can be resolved to 3 and 8. The 3rd letter of the alphabet is C and the 8th is H. This suggests a substitution: remove H for C. The result is that SHOUTS becomes SCOTUS and the solution to the anagram becomes SCOTUS NINE.
However, that sort of figuring which arrives at such a substitution is not necessary. NINE SHOUTS works as well.
p2.
Q 2231
The infographic includes reference to the Landmark Legislation that fixed the number of Justices to nine. This was 16 Stat 44 and its title can be resolved this way: (6 - 1 = 5) + 4 which equals 9 (one of the two 4s is struck as a duplicate). Another way: (6 + 4 = 10) - 1 = 9. But this clue is not necessary and the date stamp suffices.
NINE SHOUTS is illustrated in the group photo of the nine members of the Supreme Court on the top left corner of the infographic. And on the right side of the portrait is Justice Joseph P. Bradley, who was the first Justice to be appointed after the Court's number was set at nine. The legislation was passed in 1869, Bradley took his seat in 1870, and the photo was taken in 1892, just before his death. These dates demonstrate the duration in which eacg of those nine voices can work to influence the country. Bradley is known for his role in settling the disputed presidential election of 1876, as well as other national matters which have reverberated across time and may be discerned, if feintly, in today's jurisprudence.
Bradley's role on the election commission may become relevant once again, in the aftermath of the 2016 midterm election. His example may be invoked soon enough.
(Think Kavanaugh today. But military tribunals.
Maybe electoral, also.)
p3.
Q 2231
Next is the anagram that derives of the phrase, Why are we here? In Q's post this is the last line and there is no suggested answer within the text. This suggests a dig into the hints provided may provide the explicit answer to the question.
In September 2018, the new Trump Admin made it clear that it had set about re-building the Military. Why was that necessary? The previous Admin had done much to dismantle and undermine the MIlitary across the board. Also, the Benghazi disaster and the defects in the Obama Admin's foreign policy was still being felt and the new Admin set about restoring the country's foreign posture as well.
The infographic illustrates two aspects of this context. HRC personified the Obama Admin's international politics, its endangerment of citizens serving abroad, and its incoherence in response to the country's demand for accountability. The photo captured HRC retorting to questioning before Congress in which she infamously asked, "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?" As we are learning today, our federal governmental institutions were being poisoned by the Obama Admin's direct influence.
(See military purge in upcoming sauces. But also see previously posted vid of POTUS: can never forgive.)
p4.
Q 2231
Also the graphic includes references to the "purge" of military brass during the Obama Admin. This was pronounced (but little spoken of publicly) and it sent a chilling political message to officers down the ranks. It epitomized the dismantling that the Trump Admin is now in the midst of correcting in 2018. The Obama Admin also hampered the Military in war zones with irrational rules of engagement. Overall, the situation that the Trump Admin inherited invoked historical moments prior to major world wars, such as depicted in the famous 1919 cartoon that is included in the top right of the infographic. Who is the "we" in WHY ARE WE HERE?
The cartoon depicts a young child sobbing. The reader might have to look twice to spot him and even the meaning seems obscured in bathos. In additon to the prescience of the message about the pre-war politics of the time, this cartoon brings to mind the current day scurge of pedofilia and its role on the global scale. For many Anons, this rises above all other reasons that answer why we are here and how we got here.
For the Q movement there is also the date of the cartoon. May 17, 1919. This invokes Q, the 17th letter, and, to the onlooker of today, may hint at 911 and the wars that have cost much blood and treasure since. This cartoon uses the phrase, cannon fodder, which is used in the solution of the anagram, Why are we here? We were her fodder (or HRC cannon fodder). Those in service, yes. Those who got in her way politically, yes. And one shudders to imagine how children have been continually used as fodder in a war of unheard screams.
p5.