>You can’t be an expert on the power of snake oil.
I liked many of Gorka's lectures on counterterrorism. However….
Gorka clearly doesn't know what a shill is or how to deal with shills, or he is one. Anons ARE experts on the power of snake oil. The snake oil happens in this case to be the endless supply of shills that frequent this place. Q, however, is the real deal.
Information Operations can be highly credible. It is who is executing the operation and for what reasons. LOGIC helps one to discern which is which.
>Credibility starts with who you are and what your credentials are.
Sometimes yes, but unilaterally, absolutely not.
Anons have no name, no credentials, no authority upon which to hang their arguments. Yet the evidence of the impact of /qresearch, Q, and the anons is plastered everywhere in hit pieces and smear journalism….. all for a LARP.
Keep blathering Gorka….
God bless you, Praying Medic.