People saying GW is Mossad are simply turning a blind eye to all the data-reinforced research he has laid out over the last 1.5 years. He was onto the Awans LONG ago before anyone ever heard of them.
Even if he has Mossad connections that doesn't discount evidence-based research. Ignore the motivations if you want, but you can't ignore the info.
So then what is he "getting" by giving up this info?
People love to throw around counterintelligence terms like experts but few actually provide any evidence of any wrongdoing or connections.
I'm all ears.
It's frustrating when Anons are putting together great info and have a good rhythm going and someone comes along and tries to squash a source for no good reason.