>>3860191

Putin promotes principles of free speech in RT interview.

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/59091

Question: France continues to refuse accreditation to our television channel. Work is underway to develop a law that would allow banning us just for the fact that we are connected with Russia. How can you describe relations between Russia and France in this context, and what other issues have to be overcome?

Vladimir Putin: What is important here is not Russia-France relations in information exchange, but rather our overall approaches to information and its exchange and its free distribution – these are the things that are important.

We are aware of and have always heard our western colleagues say that the main principle of democracy is freedom of information. But creating various sorts of lists and councils that should decide on which media are good and which are bad – this, I believe, is totally unacceptable and has nothing to do with democracy.

Because, if we want to implement the principle of free information and its access to users, that is, to citizens of our countries, we should not make administrative efforts to ban anything or restrict anything using political and administrative structures. If you disagree with anything, you can counter it by offering your own point of view and give the viewers, listeners and internet users the opportunity to figure it out and make a decision on their own on whether this is true or it is distorted. I think this is the direction to take.

>>3860012

>All of this rookie PlaneFagging is an excellent microcosm of this whole Q operation. PlaneFagging, on ADS-B, you will only see what they want you to see. Any real operation is not going to be broadcasted to the world, to the normies, to us. Like it or not, we are normies. We do not, and will not be on the "inside" of any operation. Yes, you may receive "orders" to fire out memes, but if you really think that any "inside" information is given to you, your setting yourself up for being let down. We are just here to watch the show, and see the whole movie, as given to us by Q drops, not just the highlights given by Rotten Tomatoes (Media).

Funny, you seem to refer to mental constructs of the media with the implication that 'it sucks but we are forced to be passive.' In fact, that's sort of what your entire message is: 'your efforts mean nothing'. When confronted with evidence to the contrary, you simply deny the possibility. 'it can't be because planefags can't do that'

If planefags find out something about an airplane in distress and tell other people across any media platform, and that happens before anyone else does it… I choose to say they broke that story. You call it what you want. Your jedi mind tricks are useless here.

https://twitter.com/ScottAnthonyUSA/status/1061624236278771712

And you call us delusional. The delusion is that we need Rotten Tomatoes.

Journalism is dead.

Long live Journalism.

We REALLY are the media now.

Don't try to fight it. Just go with it. Let it go. Enjoy the Show. It's not your fault.

It's not your fault.

>>3860632

It's not your fault.

>>3860365

Why am I the only one so far to point out that Nixon was pardoned for FUTURE crimes too?

Reconcile.

(my IQ isn't that high. What does that tell you? )

>>3860750

In your horrible example, the ref breaks the story first, unless one of the the commentators sees the penalty first, says so, and the ref then confirms.

What's the significance of waiting for someone else to publish vs publishing yourself, like the linked example I provided?

>>3860721

Re:

>>3860365

See:

>>3860734

(entire premise relies on that one assumption, no?)

>>3860880

I'm not going to disagree with the notion our history isn't…..

But that's what I have to go on re: pardons. That and the law you quoted, which says nothing about future crime exclusion.

>>3860964

As written in the history books, one of the first things Ford did 'to restore peace to the country' was pardon him for all crimes, past present, and future.xxxxxxxxxx

edit

I was wrong, and my lower IQ shows :(