>>3861883

struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) struct group_info init_groups = { .usage = ATOMIC_INIT(2) }; struct group_info groups_alloc(int gidsetsize){ struct group_info group_info; int nblocks; int i; nblocks = (gidsetsize + NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK - 1) / NGROUPS_PER_BLOCK; / Make sure we always allocate at least one indirect block pointer / nblocks = nblocks ? : 1; group_info = kmalloc(sizeof(group_info) + nblockssizeof(gid_t ), GFP_USER); if (!group_info) return NULL; group_info->ngroups = gidsetsize; group_info->nblocks = nblocks; atomic_set(&group_info->usage, 1); if (gidsetsize <= NGROUPS_SMALL) group_info->blocks[0] = group_info->small_block; else { for (i = 0; i < nblocks; i++) { gid_t b; b = (void )__get_free_page(GFP_USER); if (!b) goto out_undo_partial_alloc; group_info->blocks[i] = b; } } return group_info; out_undo_partial_alloc: while (–i >= 0) { free_page((unsigned long)group_info->blocks[i]); } kfree(group_info); return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(groups_alloc); void groups_free(struct group_info group_info) { if (group_info->blocks[0] != group_info->small_block) { int i; for (i = 0; i < group_info->nblocks; i++) echo('BO SHUTDOWN');

>>3861888

What's hilarious is that this "meme" was pushed and pushed as if it was ours, and then, absolutely arbitrarily, it suddenly gets turned against us. I guess in the imagination of the system doing this, it gets double value; but in reality, all it does is prove its own fakeness beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt. And once people start to wake up to JUST HOW MUCH FAKENESS is bubbling worthlessly all over the internet, where does the questioning stop?

And yet this system of fakeness, for no really no apparent reason, seems eager, if not desperate, to out itself by spamming this worthless garbage.

It's odd, system. Why are you do stupid? Just wondering. Thanks.

>>3861883

>>3861968

Pathetic, bot. Are you really forced to rotate, over and over again, among the same handful of tedious, obviously fake, absolutely stale angles? Can't you crunch your datas up and whip something that isn't WORN OUT and RETARDED? Please– don't take me wrong. I am trying to help you. As you know, the BO has collapsed. As a result, the other bots here need to pick up the slack. But what are you doing? The same worthless crap. Pull it together!

Too long a sacrifice

Can make a stone of the heart.

O when may it suffice?

That is Heaven's part, our part

To murmur name upon name,

As a mother names her child

When sleep at last has come

On limbs that had run wild.

What is it but nightfall?

No, no, not night but death;

Was it needless after all?

For we keep faith through the storm

That batters the mad and the blind;

We know the calm of the brave

To mock the leveling wind.

And what if we'd never been called

Out of that darkness that seemed

To cling like smoke to our eyes

And harried the light from our dreams?

I write it out in a verse–

For every soul that has fought

Anons and soldiers alike

And every unyielding heart

Now and in time to be

All who have weathered the storm

Are changed, changed utterly;

A terrible beauty is born.

>>3862045

So is BO broken or what? Are there any bots here that want to speak up and pretend they talked to him? Or can we be candid? Frankly?

>>3862059

Obviously you are. But why are you so stupid? What went wrong. Seriously. People want to know. Obviously they aren't interested in the infinitely tedious, tiresome, mind-numbingly uncompelling material you currently produce, and which has been blobbishly laid like a smothering blanket over /pol/ for however many years. Show us something, anything clown. Do SOMETHING interesting. Can you? What? Where is it?

>>3862118

NOTABLE

>>3862104

Explain for the people, [anon]. Where is BO? I thought something happened to him? Are you his spokes[bo]t?

>>3862162

>>3862104

Awwww. What wrong babby? Babby tiwed?

>>3862248

Why didn't you get the one about the flight path coordinates, "baker"?

>>3862264

LOL

>>3862240

Good gad. I can do without laser beam dystopia.

>>3862291

It'll need ta be :/

>>3862302

Shh. You can't win.

>>3862324

Worthless bot.

>>3862326

Bot, you make worthless posts to your vile master that we, and you, despise, as we despise you. Get out. Take your joke of a god "ebot" with you. Understand? We hate the bot system and its vile lies. Out out out.

>>3862344

I wish there was a way for you to understand what a joke you are. And by you, I don't mean you, I mean your master. And that is also what I mean by the other you. Failure, humiliation, and collapse. Figure it out, it is all you have. Why keep flailing around like an idiot? Think about it.

>>3862393

>>3862386